[TRNSYS-users] SDHW example TRNSYS

[BOUALAMALLAH AHMED AMINE via TRNSYS-users]

COMMENT ON PEUT TRCER LE RENDEMENT INSTANTANE DE CAPTEUR SUR TRNSYS.JE DEMANDE LES ETAPES QUI NOUS LES SUIVONS.
 

    Le Dimanche 25 juin 2017 14h43, BOUALAMALLAH AHMED AMINE <b20amine at yahoo.fr> a écrit :
 

  

    Le Mercredi 21 juin 2017 3h45, Jeff Thornton via TRNSYS-users <trnsys-users at lists.onebuilding.org> a écrit :
 

 Did you take into account the incidence angle modifiers when you calculated the efficiency?

As for the second issue, did you account for any pipe losses or pump energy gains to the fluid?  Did you look to see if the differences you're calculating are within your simulation tolerances?

Jeff - TESS

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 20, 2017, at 8:11 PM, Rm Chemilo via TRNSYS-users <trnsys-users at lists.onebuilding.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> In this attachment file, I tried to calculate hourly thermal efficiency of solar collector by using this two equation >  and > . But after comparing the result, why the hourly efficiency different?
> 
> And also please check "Comparison Energy balance" sheet. I don't understand why q gain from solar collector has different value with qin storage. even though in the example there is no heat exchanger between solar collector and storage.
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> <TRNSYS EXAMPLE SDHW.xlsx>
> _______________________________________________
> TRNSYS-users mailing list
> TRNSYS-users at lists.onebuilding.org
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users at lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org


   

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20170625/fa2c84c3/attachment.htm>