[TRNSYS-users] Radiation processor Type 16 problem

[REYNIER Laurent]

Dear trnsys users,
I'm using Type 16 in a quite simple way.
I only make the following simulations : the first all over the year (0 to 8760) and the second only on a period (one week in June). And I look at the horizontal total radiation and the total radiation on a vertical slope facing south.
The results I obtain are surprising : everything goes right with the first simulation, i mean that the period of time during which a radiation is calculated  is ok (approximately 9-10 hours during winter and spring to 15 hours during summer).
But in the second simulation (in June), i only have 10 hours of radiation. More, the total radiation on a vertical slope facing south is very high.
It seems like type 16 is always thinking the simulation is running during January. I have changed the starting simulation day time in Type 16.
Can someone help me ?
Thanks in adavance.

Laurent REYNIER
Département ESE/ Division Energie/ Ingénieur Etudes et Recherche
Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
84 avenue Jean Jaurès - Champs-sur-Marne - 77447 Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 2
Tél : 01 61 44 80 55
Fax : 01 64 68 83 50
Évitez d'imprimer vos emails inutilement. Respectez l'environnement
Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et exclusifs pour le destinataire du message. N'importe quelle autre distribution, utilisation ou reproduction est non autorisée et interdite. Si vous receviez ce message par erreur, informez svp l'expéditeur immédiatement et supprimez le message de votre système.
This message and any attachments are confidential, for the exclusive use of the addressee and may be legally privileged. Any other distribution, use or reproduction is unauthorised and prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your system

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110713/6c052f22/attachment-0001.htm>