[UA] Re: ESURIOMANCY

Ted Prodromou merovingianheir at yahoo.com
Thu May 17 15:15:58 PDT 2007


Yeah, they had a -15% to their skills because of
reduced symbolic tension in the version I wrote, and
even that was an improvement over "not working at all"
which is what they were doing before the ana kids
started doing magickq.


--- Chris Cooper <insectking at yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> --- "F. A. R." <foranney at vassar.edu> wrote:
> 
> I would
> > recommend giving the
> > old-school ascetics a negative shift (10%?), since
> > their tension is weaker
> > and they represent an older version of the
> concept.
> 
> I think there may have been a penalty. I'm not sure.
> Ted Pro's original version is still up UA.COM. He's
> the actual author, I just added a few things here
> and
> there.
> 
> > They are still
> > relevant, though, and in some parts of the world
> > they're even more
> > relevant than anorexics. Maybe in India they'd
> have
> > no penalty.
> 
> I thought that giving one a penalty and the other
> not
> is a little bit of a quibble. If people are going to
> play them, just let them play.
> 
> C.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        
>
____________________________________________________________________________________Yahoo!
> oneSearch: Finally, mobile search 
> that gives answers, not web links. 
>
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
> _______________________________________________
> UA mailing list
> UA at lists.unknown-armies.com
> http://lists.unknown-armies.com/mailman/listinfo/ua
> 




More information about the UA mailing list