[UA] Re: ESURIOMANCY

[Chris Cooper]

--- "F. A. R." <foranney at vassar.edu> wrote:

I would
> recommend giving the
> old-school ascetics a negative shift (10%?), since
> their tension is weaker
> and they represent an older version of the concept.

I think there may have been a penalty. I'm not sure.
Ted Pro's original version is still up UA.COM. He's
the actual author, I just added a few things here and
there.

> They are still
> relevant, though, and in some parts of the world
> they're even more
> relevant than anorexics. Maybe in India they'd have
> no penalty.

I thought that giving one a penalty and the other not
is a little bit of a quibble. If people are going to
play them, just let them play.

C.




       
____________________________________________________________________________________Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search 
that gives answers, not web links. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC