[UA] Re: UA Paradoxes and baseball and neomancy
Ben Baer
mangork at gmail.com
Wed May 16 08:00:47 PDT 2007
>
> Neomancy blast. In first edition every school had a blast, (even
> personamancy) (ok, not mechanomancy but stay with me here) In second edition
> several of the schools had lost their blasts. I have seen no real debate
> over this here at the list, but I think the decision was a wise one. Each
> shool that lost their blasts got new spells instead (and awesome spells in
> most cases, check out what personamancy got instead and tell me that's not a
> lot better). Consider this, and scratch those stupid blasts. Seriously.
Speaking as someone who started with 2nd ed thats one of the things that
really surprised me when I got post modern Magic, just how many schools had
completly inaapropriate blasts. Amourmancy especially just did not seem like
a school that should have a blast, let alone one so powerfull.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.unknown-armies.com/pipermail/ua-unknown-armies.com/attachments/20070516/d518920f/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the UA
mailing list