[UA] Weirdness: unintentional cannibalism

[Zach Johnson]

Primarily, it's different degrees of Self check between the two
examples.  4 or 5 if it tasted bad, 7 if it was tasteeee!

Isolation follows in the second instance if the mind begins to think about
giving in to the urgings, because, they are thoughts that don't belong in
civilized society.  

And big violence (9) to hunt the most dangerous game of all for the
purpose of eating, or eating... sashimi.

Z

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Susan Dohnim wrote:

> Speaking of hardened notches, earlier this week the question of self-checks 
> came up in the campaign I'm in. It seems as though Mak Attak is working 
> locally, and to make a long story short, why is unintentional cannibalism a 
> self-7 check?
> 
> Am I just a sociopath, or is that way too high? How would folks here react 
> to finding out that they'd unintentionally eaten human meat? I'd be a little 
> disgusted, but if it tasted okay and I wasn't worried about disease I can't 
> see myself minding that much. Yeah I'd be pissed off at whoever served it, 
> but a self-check? For doing something unintentionally? Not sure I buy it.
> 
> Opins?
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed 
> experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> UA mailing list
> UA at lists.unknown-armies.com
> http://lists.unknown-armies.com/mailman/listinfo/ua
>