[UA] Silly Epideromancy Rules question

[Rayburn, Russell E.]

Now I'm thinking of an epideromancy variant that can ONLY get charges from
damage inflicted by other people.  Taboo would be something like an
entropomancers... intentionally avoiding damage.

But that might be too powerful? Hmmm.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stolze [mailto:holycrow at mindspring.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 3:50 PM
To: The Unknown Armies RPG Mailing List
Subject: RE: [UA] Silly Epideromancy Rules question

<snip>
>Another silly question, which seems the opposite of this...
>
>Same epideromancer, same broken nose.
>
>Does he get a charge from that?  I'd think not ( since it wasn't
intentional
>self mutilation ) but what do people here think?

The fat lip is charge-neutral -- no gain, no loss.
</snip>