[UA] Question about Cliomancy in the OU

[Timothy Groth]

Ok Cliomancy claims to be one of the oldest forms of magick.  Now 
people probably don't dispute the claim but does anyone really buy 
it?  It seems pretty obvious that it can't be (just from its 
description).  I didn't even need to read the bit latter in the book 
that put it firmly as another post-modern school.

So in your opinion do you think other OU members buy the hype or not? 
How about Cliomancers themselves, who should be thinking at least 
somewhat critically about their own school of magick?

_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua