RES: [UA] Old groups and power
Mario Magallanes
aegypto at telefonica.net
Thu Apr 25 13:46:00 PDT 2002
DL escribió:
>
> Hi Mario! Long time no see ya!
Hey, Haroudo. How's life going?
> Well, i end meant both kinds of rituals. Epoch call the case of the
> Cryptomancers, and in this case, is more than right they have problems,
> since they draw directly from the IC/Avatars. But some rituals/ritualistic
> methods, call for another kind of resonance. I mean, I picture UA as the
> real world, with only one difference: the OU exists.
Yup.
>[...] since UA was exactly one
> attempt (very well suceeded) to make another kind of paranormal world,
> without connections. Ok, but lets say they both cohexist (im mispelling
> again, right?), and maybe dont realize or dont reconize the other as a true
> aspect of magic. Dont you think it would be possible? Or im too stubborn? :)
Eh, having two occult undergrounds (one classic, one postmodern) which
don't acknowledge each other would be tricky. Not impossible, but
tricky. Plus, I'd say the lines are blurred when it comes to certain
groups and schools of magick (the Sleepers, criptomancy, cliomancy et
al). And while each underground can disdain the other, at some point
they'll collide. Particularly when there is power to be gained.
I guess there is no real reason against having both classic and
postmodern occult. Within canon? That would be difficult, but who cares
about canon anyways? Now, I'm more partial to the postmodern stuff, but
that's me. In the end, is about having fun.
Mario Magallanes
--
Save the kittens
http://home.adelphia.net/~ncavezze/sigs/kitteh2.jpg
_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua
More information about the UA
mailing list