[UA] Mother (was Re: Archetypes...)

Cassady Toles Con_Job at excite.com
Sun May 27 21:48:27 PDT 2001


On Sun, 27 May 2001 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT), ua at lists.uchicago.edu wrote:

  I think the Comte is pissed off 'cause WECHBY, in the
  role of the Worshipped Whore/the Sacred
  Prostitute-Priestess/the Saint-sinner-mother-lover/ or
  whatever syndrome has already booted Compte's dearly
  loved Archetype mother down to house of Renunciation.
  
This only works if you assume A) the Naked Goddess is the WECHBY, which I
don't necessarily believe; and B) the WECHBY and the Mother occupy the same
space, something the canon of UA actively denies by noting the Mother is
still an available archetype to follow.

I no more believe the Mother and the Whore are the same space metaphysically
than that the Father and the Pimp are the same metaphysically.  I think
there's an inherent nature to bilateralize metaphysical cocepts (how's that
for a college created sentence) and that somehow this perceptor-created
bisection has universal value due to one's perception of it.  That is, that
we will tend to look at something assign two "sides" to it.  We will then
tend to assume that everyone percieve's those two sides.  I don't think that
the universe necessarily assumes those sides, or rather, it assigns sides
that share a common point.  The two sides of the mother are nurturing vs.
smothering.  The whore is really a separate concept.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am the messiah in the bottom of a bottle of Jack Daniel's.  Drink of me
and
no peace." -- Cobra Baghdad www.peoplehateme.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/



_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua




More information about the UA mailing list