[UA] Risk: The Thread That Will Not End

[Royal Minister of Stuff]

Dude, I understand just fine.  In all the cases you
listed, an Entropomancer can tell by the very fact
that he doesn't get a charge from it that there's no
danger.  Entropomancy CAN be used as a sophisticaed
danger sense.

And Cliomancy can be used as a kind of yes/no
postcognition.  And dipsomancy is a kind of toxin
sense.  After all, as is graciously countered in the
initial UA book, the root -mancy does have to do with
detection.

This is why I encourage metagaming, so the next time
you get a player, they'll be thinking about what's
happening to them on as many levels as possible.

--- Greg Stolze <holycrow at mindspring.com> wrote:
> 
> Dude, it's all about the intersection.  The
> entropomancer has to believe
> he's in danger AND he has to genuinely BE in danger.
> 
> 
> Make more sense now?  It's not an on/off light
> switch: More like a light
> where two switches must be turned on.
> 
> -G.


=====
-- Rp Bowman, Royal Minister of Stuff
The Electronic Nation of Yokeltania:
http://www.geocities.com/yokeltania/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua