[UA] Bodybag danger sense

[Greg Stolze]

>If the bodybag allows a friend to fire at him (avoiding the
>Russian roulette route because of earlier conversations of
>blanks at close proximity), then that is taking a risk.  If
>the gun is completely filled with blanks, then I suppose
>the bodybag gets no charge.  Thus, he knows that the gun's
>remaining shots are harmless.

This also presumes adepts automatically know how many charges they're
holding.  The bodybag in question might not know the gun was unloaded until
his spell failed.  Or, even then, he wouldn't know it wasn't just a simple
failure.

The rules don't say one way or t'other.  You could play it that while a
PLAYER knows how many charges a character has, the character herself does
not...

A real busybody GM could do secret charges along with secret damage --
though, damn, what a hassle.

-G.

"A pathetic, unparalleled abomination.  'Ishtar', come back.  All is forgiven."
                -Michael Rechtshaffen reviews "Freddie Got Fingered"



_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua