[UA] Cultures in animals

[Timothy Ferguson]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ua-admin at lists.uchicago.edu [mailto:ua-admin at lists.uchicago.edu]On
> Behalf Of Nick Wedig
> Sent: Friday, 8 June 2001 11:57 PM
> To: ua at lists.uchicago.edu
> Subject: Re:Re[2]: [UA] Cultures in animals
>
>
> >And there's a thought.  Maybe animals exist in the way they do
> >_because_ of the previous invisible Clergy.  There's lions and tigers
> >because they embody some part of the previous "Hunter" archetype who
> >helped form this world.
>
> Interesting... Other animals are probably combinations of other
> archetypes, or archetypes from past incarnations (platypi and
> seahorses work for Mystic Hermaphrodite, other creatures for
> other archetypes, perhaps archetypes we no longer have).

Um, why are platypodes hermaphrodites?  The females lay eggs and...what?

Frankly if it comes from the old clergy, it might be linked to any damn
thing.  Who is to say that last time “The Man with the Electrostatic Bill”
didn’t have as much supernatural oomph as the Object of Desire has this
time.  We are assuming a lot about the last set of humans here...

Animals as cosmic graffiti designed by last times Satirist...I like.

That means next time around we get lots of agressive little monkeys waving
square , coloured flowers and hitting each other with sticks.


_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua