[UA] Invisibles

[Doug Stalker]

ramiel at subreality.com wrote:


> 
> Joe Iglesias writes:
> 
> > >Hey, I was curious who out there read/was interested in the Invisibles,
> 
> Bueno!

When James Palmer was over in Sydney I got to read a bunch of his
Invisiibles stuff - I really liked it.  I think it's overall more OTE
than UA, but anything that works for one will probably work for the
other.


> > One horrifying realization I made a ways back is that the rpg the series as a whole meshes best with is Shadowrun.  Meditate on this.
> 
> That idea sprains my mind.  May I ask how?

One of my friend started a Shadowrun campaign a while back that was
really good - he asked for very little in the way of combat abilities
and he got it.  Unfortunatly he doesn't have enough time to run it
anymoe, since he's a forth year medicine student.  And he just went
overseas for a few months.

Every other shadowrun I've played in has ending up with large amounts of
combat, no matter what efforts we (as players) make to work around it.  

But now I'm thinking about a UA-rules Shadowrun... which will probably
end up just another great campaign idea I don't have time to run. 
<sigh>

 
> However I think the UA rules system is perfect for running an Invisies
> game.

It's a very flexible system; it should be adaptable to almost anything. 
Maybe I'll try using it for DnD just to throw the players off. 

 - Doug


-- 
_____________________________________________________________
  Network Operations Engineer - Big Pond Advance Satellite
 Ericsson Australia - Level 5, 184 The Broadway, Sydney 2000
  Ph: +61-416-085-390   Email: doug at satellite.bigpond.com

_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua