[UA] PoMoMa NC17
Timothy Toner
thanatos at interaccess.com
Mon Apr 24 12:09:03 PDT 2000
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Milne <khris at clara.net>
To: 'ua at lists.uchicago.edu' <ua at lists.uchicago.edu>
Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: [UA] PoMoMa NC17
>
>I can't imagine it's the nipples that are doing it - I'm
>sure that most WW books have a much larger nipple count.
>Which leads to two conclusions. I'm hoping the first is the
>reason.
Well, there's the question of -tease-. Most fantasy artists do a remarkable
job in depicting the nipple under clothing that must be gold leafed on for
that level of detail. One of the more bizarre instances of this is the
cover of the Thaumaturgy book, which depicts a topless woman. What's
apparent, looking at it, is that the fantasy artist went for the tease; the
body was positioned just so, and the smoke was positioned just so. The
problem is that, well, the artist, while quite adept, wasn't up to the task.
The result is a cover that has a woman with no nipplage where, by God, there
ought to be nipplage!
>
>1. It's the Carnal illustration. So it mildly resembles a
>penis. Wow. So do a lot of things to a lot of people, but
> they're not hidden behind a counter.
It's not just that it's a penis, but a _drippy_ penis. There's a diff in a
lot of people's minds.
>I'm also surprised that LG$ didn't get the same treatment
>for its depiction of masturbation. Seems some things slip
>by the net...
Well, uh, for them to notice that, the Powers That Be would have to _read._
_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua
More information about the UA
mailing list