[UA] DNA
Epoch
msulliva at wso.williams.edu
Fri Apr 21 14:31:47 PDT 2000
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Todd Erickson wrote:
> Something else to consider...go the other way, away
> from "This is too scientific."
>
> If the individual in question becomes enough a part of
> the system, of the magic...couldn't it be possible
> that they don't necessarily HAVE DNA? Or to put it
> another way (partially, probably, drawing from my
> background in MtA)...there might have been a time,
> before science defined everything, that there wasn't
> DNA, etc...people were just people. And becoming
> enough a part of the magic, you begin to lose a lot of
> the modern definitions of reality around yourself...
It's not "Mage:The Ascension," folks. Schools of magic aren't ancient,
they don't deny the technological aspects of society, and they're
/additions/ to the laws of reality as we know it, not substitutes for it.
Mike
--
"Running for our lives through the ducks in heat with our eyes closed."
www.sluggy.com
_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua
More information about the UA
mailing list