[UA] DNA

Epoch msulliva at wso.williams.edu
Fri Apr 21 14:31:47 PDT 2000


On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Todd Erickson wrote:

> Something else to consider...go the other way, away
> from "This is too scientific."
> 
> If the individual in question becomes enough a part of
> the system, of the magic...couldn't it be possible
> that they don't necessarily HAVE DNA?  Or to put it
> another way (partially, probably, drawing from my
> background in MtA)...there might have been a time,
> before science defined everything, that there wasn't
> DNA, etc...people were just people.  And becoming
> enough a part of the magic, you begin to lose a lot of
> the modern definitions of reality around yourself...

It's not "Mage:The Ascension," folks.  Schools of magic aren't ancient,
they don't deny the technological aspects of society, and they're
/additions/ to the laws of reality as we know it, not substitutes for it.

Mike

--
"Running for our lives through the ducks in heat with our eyes closed."

www.sluggy.com


_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua




More information about the UA mailing list