[TRNSYS-users] COOLING PEAK LOAD CALCULATION
jeannieboef
jeannieboef at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 03:11:49 PDT 2012
This is generally an industry problem. Chillers are often designed
with a PLR performane optimized at 50% of max load. This is because
you want it to be most efficient in the area where it will be
operating most of the time. These performance curves play a major role
and are quite different from machine to machine. Traditionally we spec
a max capacity and a COP, when actually we should be looking more
closely at the part load ratios expected and those of the machine.
Sent from my iPhone
On 03.10.2012, at 19:06, David BRADLEY <d.bradley at tess-inc.com> wrote:
> Juan Francisco,
> This is a very good question to which there are as many valid
> responses as there are responders. My feeling is that traditional
> methods for sizing cooling equipment lead to very over sized
> equipment and the energy inefficiency that comes with it.
> Traditional sizing involves a steady-state, worst-case scenario when
> all the equipment is on, all the lights are on, and all the people
> are in the building. Some tools also do not account for zone
> adjacencies; they compute the worst case assuming that all zones are
> thermally isolated from each other. There is no credit for thermal
> mass and no credit for shading. That is obviously going to give you
> the greatest possible cooling load. There are lots and lots of other
> justifiable methods, some of which you mention. What I have done in
> the past is to look at what the peak cooling load is under a number
> of these methods (with normal building operation during an average
> weather year, including shading, excluding shading, during an
> "extreme" weather sequence of days, during a "design day" that
> repeats itself. From multiple tests, you can get an idea of how
> sensitive the peak cooling load is. You can then do some experiments
> of limiting the available cooling power in order to see how badly
> you miss your target cooling temperature. If the overshoot is small,
> then under sizing the equipment a little bit will create energy
> savings and the comfort penalty will not be great. With all that
> information, it is then possible to do an informed sizing the
> cooling equipment.
> Best,
> David
>
>
> On 10/3/2012 04:44, JUAN FRANCISCO BELMONTE TOLEDO wrote:
>> Dear users.
>>
>> Any idea how to make a good cooling peak load calculation with
>> trnsys, in a similar way as max. heat load calculation does in
>> trnbuild?.
>>
>> I mean hipothesis about Solar radiation (What values we must
>> consider and where we can find them), temperature (we consider a
>> sinusoidal wave shape -as EnergyPlus does- or constant
>> value, ...).., in which months we must simulate (for example i´ve
>> found many building with higher values in September due to the Sun
>> is lower and they had a lot of windows,.. ), , tmy files should n
>> ot be used because are average values, or yes...etc.
>>
>> thank you.
>> Regards.
>>
>> Juan Francisco Belmonte Toledo
>> Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TRNSYS-users mailing list
>> TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu
>> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users
>
> --
> ***************************
> David BRADLEY
> Principal
> Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
> 22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
> Madison, WI 53703 USA
>
> P:+1.608.274.2577
> F:+1.608.278.1475
> d.bradley at tess-inc.com
>
> http://www.tess-inc.com
> http://www.trnsys.com
> _______________________________________________
> TRNSYS-users mailing list
> TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20121005/0938897c/attachment-0005.htm>
More information about the TRNSYS-users
mailing list