[TRNSYS-users] InterpolateData

Erik Boschek erikboschek at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 21 06:46:20 PDT 2012


Dear David / TRNSYS-users,
 
thank you for the hint for using DynamicData. That worked and in the mean time I have upgraded to version 17.
 
I have another question about using what is now called InterpolateData. Essentially, I was wondering if it is possible to extract directly the mimimum and maximum values of the independant variables from the data file being interpolated. Obviously, values outside of these ranges are not extrapolated. Thus, it would be sometimes be useful to use those limits automatically as constraints in the logic of the component.
 
As a first try, I have modified "InterpolateData" to return an array containing all these limits - something like:
 xMinMax(1,1) = X1dd(1,ILUdd)
xMinMax(1,2) = X1dd(NX1dd,ILUdd)
.
.
.
xMinMax(6,1) = X6dd(1,ILUdd)
xMinMax(6,2) = X6dd(NX6dd,ILUdd) 
 
Is there is a more straight forward way in which I don't have to modify "InterpolateData"? Or am I missing something?
 
 
Thanks,
 
Erik


________________________________
From: David BRADLEY <d.bradley at tess-inc.com>
To: Erik Boschek <erikboschek at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu" <TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] DynamicData and Visual Fortran XE 2011


Erik,
  We found and fixed this in Trnsys17 when we moved over to the IVF compilers. CVF didn't mind if you exited a subroutine without deallocating your allocatable arrays (it deallocated them for you). IVF is a bit more rigorous and forces you do deallocate arrays manually. You need to add the following lines to the GROW() subroutine in DynamicData

Deallocate(X1TEMPdd)
Deallocate(X2TEMPdd)
Deallocate(X3TEMPdd)
Deallocate(X4TEMPdd)
Deallocate(LUSTORTEMPdd)
Deallocate(YDATATEMPdd)
Deallocate(DATAINTEMPdd)
Deallocate(IPTTEMPdd)

  Another issue that you may run into is that IVF does not like when a function returns without setting a return value. CVF was more forgiving about that. You will need to go through some of the TrnsysFunctions routines and make sure that they always set a return value. Again, this is fixed in Trnsys17.
Best,
 David


On 5/23/2012 06:13, Erik Boschek wrote: 
Dear TRNSYS users,
>
>I am in the process of migrating to Intel Visual Fortran Composer XE 2011, with VS2010 from CVF6.6 for component development. I'm currently using TRNSYS 16.
>
>Generally, with not too many problems I've gotten TRNSYS to compile and a few custom types.
>
>However, in the mean time I've run into an issue which seems to be related to calling "DynamicData", which I use quite often.
>
>I've found that if I create a simulation with more than one call, TRNSYS crashes with a run-time error "severe (151): allocatable array is already allocated" (as attaced screen shot).
>
>To check that it wasn't related to my own component, I could also reproduce this simply by e.g. putting two instances of TESS Type581 (multi dimensional interpolation) into an empty project. This never occurs for the basic installed TRNDll or one I've compiled with the old compiler.
>
>Is this problem known to anyone and is there a fix? Is the new intel compiler supported or is it known to give problems with TRNSYS? Would this problem disapear using TRNSYS 17?
>
>Thanks for any insight,
>
>Erik Boschek
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users 

-- 
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
Madison, WI  53703 USA

P:+1.608.274.2577
F:+1.608.278.1475 d.bradley at tess-inc.com http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20120621/923b537c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the TRNSYS-users mailing list