[TRNSYS-users] thermal resistance of external shading device
Marion Hiller
hiller at transsolar.com
Thu Nov 3 02:17:11 PDT 2011
Dear Antoine,
looking at the calculation, it the resistance is always active when the
shading is active.
Maybe you confused due to the influence of the frame?
The u-value of the frame is not influenced by the additional resistance
of the shading.
The NTYPE 50 UWIN is calculated of three different parts:
a) Centre of glass
b) Edge of glass (influenced by the spacer)
c) Frame
The Uglas (centre of glass and edge of glass) without the inner and out
outer heat transfer is calculated by
Redge=(1/alfain+(rshdin*shdin)+1/uedge
. +(rshdout*shdout)+1/alfout)/fe
Rcenter=(1/alfain+(rshdin*shdin)+1/ucentr
. +(rshdout*shdout)+1/alfout)/fg
Rges=Redge*Rcenter/(Redge+Rcenter)
UGLAS=1/(Rges-1/alfain-1/alfout)
Then the frame is included:
UGL(N)=UGLAS* (1.-FFRAM)+UFRAM*FFRAM ! total window u-value
without inner and outer heat transfer
Finally the NTYPE 50 is calculated by:
CASE (50) ! u-value of window (glass+frame)with standard inner
and outer heat trasnfer coefficients
IF (HO.GT.30.) RO=0.04
IF (HO.LT.0.005) RO=0.0
IF ((HO.LE.30.).AND.(HO.GE.0.005)) RO=0.13
UGLK=1./(1./(UGL(NWI)/3.6)+0.13+RO)
ENDIF
OUT(IOUT)=UGLK*3.6
Best,
Marion
Dipl.-Ing. Marion Hiller
TRANSSOLAR: KlimaEngineering - Technologien für energieeffizientes Bauen
und Nutzerkomfort in Gebäude
Munich - New York - Stuttgart + 49.711.67976.0
Transsolar Energietechnik GmbH, Curiestrasse 2, 70563 Stuttgart
Amtsgericht Stuttgart - HRB 23347, Steuernummer 99073/00911, USt-IdNr.:
DE152272639
Geschäftsführer: Dipl.Ing. Matthias Schuler, Dipl.Ing. Thomas Auer,
Dipl.Phys. Stefan Holst, Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Bleicher
_____
Von: Antoine Gautier [mailto:antoine.gautier at solamen.fr]
Gesendet: Montag, 31. Oktober 2011 18:36
An: trnsys-users at cae.wisc.edu
Betreff: [TRNSYS-users] thermal resistance of external shading device
Dear all
I use the surface output Uwin to assess the thermal impact of an
external shading device.
As you know the thermal properties entered for the shading devices are
effective only if a shading device is actually defined for the window in
the zone description.
I get the following results whereas I specified DeltaR = 0.06 m2.K.h/kJ
in input. Does anybody understand this better than I do? i.e. why does
the shading factor modify the thermal impact though the shading device
is only active during periods of time with zero irradiation? Why do I
not get the expected DeltaR in output but half the value?
Shading factor - Uwin w/o shading - Uwin with shading [kJ/h.m2.K] -
DeltaR [m2.K.h/kJ]
1 - 4.93 - 4.22 - 0.034
0.75 - 4.93 - 4.36 - 0.027
Thanks for your help
--
Antoine Gautier
Solamen
+33 6 98 78 56 46
antoine.gautier at solamen.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20111103/99c424b1/attachment-0005.htm>
More information about the TRNSYS-users
mailing list