[TRNSYS-users] massive buildings

Eunice Vilaverde Fontão dec07001 at fe.up.pt
Fri Oct 30 05:10:11 PDT 2009


Thanks, so you believe that by increasing the timesept the results  
will be more accurate for massive walls.

I am using 1 hour for timesept because it is easy to deal with the results.

Still I tkink that Trnsys is not very accurate for massive constructions.

Best regards
Eunice

Citando Andreas Klesse <klesse at lee.rub.de>:

> Hello,
>
> you can simulate it as one wall, but have to increase your timestep in
> the Trnbuild file.
>
> Andreas Klesse
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Eunice Vilaverde Fontão [mailto:dec07001 at fe.up.pt]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2009 11:39
> An: TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu
> Betreff: [TRNSYS-users] massive buildings
>
> Dear all
>
> I am working with massive buildings and it is been difficult to relate
> the results from trnsys with others simulation tools because of the
> big difference among them.
>
> I need this comparison to validate a model for other studies.
>
> I have two questions:
>
> 1. Which is the best way to simulate a heavy wall?  Is divining the
> massive part in many layers or creating a fictive mass less layer?
>
> 2. How can I know ( for comparing purposes ) the amount of the total
> gains that are being useful to the simulation.
>
> All tips are welcome, thanks.
>
> Eunice
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TRNSYS-users mailing list
> TRNSYS-users at cae.wisc.edu
> https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users
>
>






More information about the TRNSYS-users mailing list