[TRNSYS-users] Re : About Shading masks (type 67) and Overhang and wingwalls shading (type 34)

Diego A. Arias daarias at wisc.edu
Mon Mar 19 14:21:45 PDT 2007


Dear Morice,

I prepared a tutorial on how to connect Type67, 34 and 56.
Go to 
http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys/downloads/tutorials_and_examples/connecting34_67.pdf
Please let me know if you have comments about the tutorial.
Best regards,

Diego


Fabien Morice wrote:
> Thanks Diego
> But could you tell me more ?
> How can I connect the type 67 with the type 56a ? (Which output)
> And if I want tu use type 67, type 56a and type 34 ?
> Have you an example for me ?
>  
> Fabien Morice
>
>  
> ----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Diego A. Arias <daarias at wisc.edu>
> À : Fabien Morice <fabien.morice at yahoo.fr>
> Cc : trnsys-users at engr.wisc.edu
> Envoyé le : Vendredi, 9 Mars 2007, 17h17mn 11s
> Objet : Re: [TRNSYS-users] About Shading masks (type 67) and Overhang 
> and wingwalls shading (type 34)
>
> Hi Fabien,
>
> You do not need to use Type34 in combination with Type67.  Type 67 was
> created to avoid the problem that you found in the mailing list: having
> to use two instances of Type 68.  My answer to Amelie was before Type67
> was available.
> Best regards,
>
> Diego
>
>
> Fabien Morice wrote:
> > Dear TRNSYS users, I have some questions for you :
> >  
> > 1°)    I try to use the type 67 with the type 56a (Multizone Building).
> >         But, it seems to me that I *_must_* used the type 34 in
> > complement.
> >         [Output 11 of type 34 (Fraction of solar shading) ---> Input
> > of type 56a (created by me to used in Input of External Shading Factor)]
> >         because the type 67 gives me 2 outputs (among 11) :
> >         [Output 7 of type 67 (Fraction of beam visible on horizontal
> > for mask) ---> ?
> >         [Output 9 of type 67 (Fraction of diffuse visible on
> > horizontal for mask) ---> ?
> >         that I don't know used with the type 56a directly.
> > 2°)   I have read the files of the forum and I try  the solution
> > proposed by Diego (Wed Oct 26 2005) to Amelie Mariller
> >         who recommend to use two type 68 (one horizontal and one
> > vertical) with each type 34.
> >         So, I have created two files in ".dat" :
> >         the first with a slope of 0°
> >         and the second with a slope of 90°.
> >         The two files dividing the same others informations.
> >         But I have the message : Error "Unable to read mask file,
> > please check file syntax and format." when I launch the calculs.
> >  
> > 3°)    So, I use only one type 68 with one type 34 :
> >        
> >         [Output 3 of type 67 Shaded beam radiation for surface --->
> > Input 5 of type 34 (Beam radiation on surface)]
> >         [Output 10 of type 67 Shaded diffuse radiation on horizontal
> > for mask ---> Input 4 of type 34 (Horizontal diffuse radiation)]
> >         [Output 11 of type 67 Shaded total radiation on horizontal for
> > mask ---> Input 3 of type 34 (Total horizontal radiation)]
> >  
> >         Parameter 1 of type 34 Upstream component mode = 1 and not 0
> >  
> >         In more, I use two Equations :
> >  
> >         a)    Equation 1 :
> >  
> >                 Sky diffuse radiation on titled surface i (Output of
> > type 109)
> >                                             +
> >                 Groung reflected diffuse radiation on titled surface i
> > (Output of type 109)
> >                                             =
> >                 Diffuse radiation for opening (Input 6 of type 67)
> >  
> >         b)    Equation 2 :
> >  
> >                 Sky diffuse radiation on horizontal
> >                                             +
> >                 Groung reflected diffuse radiation on horizontal
> >                                             =
> >                 Diffuse radiation on horizontal (Input 4 of type 69b
> > and Input 4 of type 67)
> >  
> >         After simulation, I have controlled the five View factor
> > (Outputs 6,7,8,9,10 of type 34) by Online plotter (type 65d)
> >         and I'm surprise because the sum is not equal to 1 !
> >         But if I change :      
> >         Parameter 1 of type 34 Upstream component mode = 0 and not 1
> >         the sum is correct.
> >  
> >        * Anyone knows what I should do? Thanks.*
> > **
> > *Fabien Morice.*
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
> > questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des
> > expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses
> > <http://fr.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42054/*http://fr.answers.yahoo.com>.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TRNSYS-users mailing list
> > TRNSYS-users at engr.wisc.edu
> > https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users
> >  
>
>
> -- 
> Diego A. Arias
> TRNSYS Coordinator
> Solar Energy Laboratory
> University of Wisconsin - Madison
> 1500 Engineering Drive
> Madison, WI 53706
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos 
> questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des 
> expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
> <http://fr.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42054/*http://fr.answers.yahoo.com>.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> TRNSYS-users mailing list
> TRNSYS-users at engr.wisc.edu
> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users
>   


-- 
Diego A. Arias
TRNSYS Coordinator
Solar Energy Laboratory
University of Wisconsin - Madison
1500 Engineering Drive
Madison, WI 53706



More information about the TRNSYS-users mailing list