[Trace-users] Demand Controlled Ventilation
Scott Hackel
shackel at ecw.org
Tue Aug 31 07:53:06 PDT 2010
Jen -
I would agree in general with Julia's process; in multizone (e.g. VAV) systems especially TRACE's DCV algorithm is based almost entirely on the critical zone. Though, it could be argued that if everything is set up correctly, this is how a DCV system should be operated. But it is tricky to make sure everything is set up correctly, especially with TRACE's limited hourly reporting.
I would add one additional thought that may shed a little more light on things. Did you change the System Ventilation Flag (under Systems - Advanced) from 'Sum Room OA' to 'ASHRAE...Vent Reset' to ALLOW for DCV? If so, you're also turning on the critical zone based ventilation control. This will change your OA volumes throughout the entire year, going well beyond the demand controlled hours. If you changed that flag, check the reports to see what happened to the design ventilation rates; my guess is that they've gone up in the baseline.
Scott Hackel, P.E., LEED AP
Energy Engineer
Energy Center of Wisconsin
455 Science Drive, Suite 200
Madison, WI 53711
608.238.8276 x129
shackel at ecw.org
The Buildings Team
Design decisions through energy, economics and emissions analysis.
www.ecw.org/Buildings
-----Original Message-----
From: trace-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:trace-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of trace-users-request at lists.onebuilding.org
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:08 PM
To: trace-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Trace-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 6
Send Trace-users mailing list submissions to
trace-users at lists.onebuilding.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trace-users-onebuilding.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
trace-users-request at lists.onebuilding.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
trace-users-owner at lists.onebuilding.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Trace-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Demand Controlled Ventilation (Jen Redington)
2. Re: Demand Controlled Ventilation (Julia Beabout)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:15:32 -0400
From: "Jen Redington" <redington at vitetta.com>
To: <trace-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: [Trace-users] Demand Controlled Ventilation
Message-ID: <5e13a5e7-99f0-4d8f-94bb-498e099d566d at vitetta.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I am doing an energy model for LEED and added demandcontrolled ventilation to several spaces in both the design and baselinemodels. This doubled my energy cost savings for the project. The spaceheating gas use went down 25% in the design model but doubled in the baselinemodel. I can?t see any reason why the baseline energy use would increase,and the savings in the design case seem a little unrealistic since DCV is onlybeing used in some spaces. Any ideas what could be wrong? Any one else have anysimilar issues?
Thanks,
Jen Redington
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trace-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100830/417cb0c3/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julia Beabout <juliabeabout at yahoo.com>
To: Jen Redington <redington at vitetta.com>,
trace-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Trace-users] Demand Controlled Ventilation
Message-ID: <544973.43622.qm at web111410.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Jen,
I agree. That does sound fishy. Generally, I do not use the DCV control
feature within Trace to calc my energy savings from DCV. Some LEED reviewers
have questioned using it as well. It's not that the algorithm is not correct
its just that applying it to a real project can be tricky and require some level
of judgment that the software doesn't know about. Similarly, I rarely use the
ASHRAE 62 calc capabilities in Trace to simulate that calc. Except of the
simplest of situations the calc can be thrown off very easily. One room can
throw off the whole calc, so some judgment and adjustment is needed ....in my
experience, it frequently take more time to comb through the calcs to figure out
which spaces are throwing off the calc than to estimate the savings via other
means. I still estimate both with in Trace so it doesn't count as an
exceptional calculation for LEED but I don't use Trace's built in routines to do
it.
For DCV, based on the occupancy schedules for the spaces with DCV, I calc and
make an adjusted OA schedule for those spaces. This is actually a lot less work
and easier than it sounds.
Similarly, for the ASHRAE 62 calc, I do it on a spreadsheet and then force that
cfm value at the system level in Trace (System level, Options Tab, Advanced
options button). If you have a VAV system that needs an ASHRAE 62 calc and you
are using DCV in some spaces, then you will need to adjust the system level OA
schedule to reflect the DCV.
You can check to see that the program is bringing the correct OA cfm and adjust
the schedule as needed by reviewing the cfms via the View Reports, Analysis tab,
Graph Profiles and Energy button. Once there, In the view menu, turn on the
"settings" menu and switch to the "table" view. Then you can navigate the
settings on the left side of the screen to get Trace to display the cfms of the
AHU/system(s) in question. (You could also use this viewing feature to review
what Trace did with the OA cfm when you used the automatic DCV and/or ASHRAE 62
calc within Trace to help find clues as to what's going on and if indeed Trace
is simulating those features and the OA cfm correctly).
Again, the manual adjusted schedules and forced cfm method may sound difficult
and like a lot of work, but it's not really. Once you do it once, you're done.
And, it gives you a confidence level that Trace is simulating the OA cfm
correctly.
Hope that helps.
Julia
________________________________
From: Jen Redington <redington at vitetta.com>
To: trace-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 8:15:32 AM
Subject: [Trace-users] Demand Controlled Ventilation
I am doing an energy model for LEED and added demand controlled ventilation to
several spaces in both the design and baseline models. This doubled my energy
cost savings for the project. The space heating gas use went down 25% in the
design model but doubled in the baseline model. I can?t see any reason why the
baseline energy use would increase, and the savings in the design case seem a
little unrealistic since DCV is only being used in some spaces. Any ideas what
could be wrong? Any one else have any similar issues?
Thanks,
Jen Redington
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/trace-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100830/a566cfd8/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Trace-users mailing list
Trace-users at lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trace-users-onebuilding.org
End of Trace-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 6
******************************************
More information about the Trace-users
mailing list