[Equest-users] LEED v4 Data center energy modelling

[Bishop, Bill]

Hi Vishal,
You might try posting to bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org> or LEEDuser<https://leeduser.buildinggreen.com/forums> for questions specific to the rating system. Then you can post to equest-users again if you have questions specific to eQUEST inputs.
I have not done a LEED V4 Datacenters project yet. There are four pages of guidance on Minimum Energy Performance for Datacenters in the LEED V4 Reference Guide for BD+C. Seems like you have to start there, with understanding those requirements. (I have not tried to understand them at this point, and can’t comment on the minimum three, and up to five model variations that are described.)
The energy simulation methodology generally follows ASHRAE 90.1-2010 PRM, as for other LEED V4 projects.

Regards,
~Bill

William Bishop, PE, BEMP, BEAP, CEM, LEED AP
Senior Energy Engineer

[Pathfinder-EA-logo-2]T: (585) 698-1956                        F: (585) 325-6005
bbishop at pathfinder-ea.com<mailto:wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com>        www.pathfinder-ea.com<http://www.pathfinder-ea.com/>
[cid:image006.png at 01D42335.A49F01F0]134 South Fitzhugh Street
Rochester, NY 14608                                Ask me why Carbon Fee & Dividend may be right for you.
*****Pathfinder’s Summer Hours begin June 4th.  Our switchboard and office will be closed at noon on Fridays through August 31st.****

From: Equest-users [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of equest user via Equest-users
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:02 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] LEED v4 Data center energy modelling

Hi all Energy Modelers,

Hope everyone is doing well.

I have been working on Energy modeling for LEED ratings like NC, CS.

However this time I have come across LEED  V4 Datacenters rating in which the modeling strategy is quite different.

As far as the reference guidelines say I have to make three models (Model 1: Baseline with full IT loads, Model 2: Proposed with full IT loads, Model 3: Proposed with Initial IT loads). However the 5% mandatory savings mentioned has to be calculated by comparing models 1 and 2.

I have few queries which are bulleted below

•         I am not quite sure why is there a need for model 3. I guess it has to do something with PUE calculations. Can anyone help me out how model 3 will be used?

•         What is the intent behind PUE calculations? PUE values of which models are to be calculated and why?

•         What are the important points need to be followed for datacenter modeling?

Also I would like if anyone has any Methods/suggestions regarding the energy simulation methodology.

I would be using eQUEST for this purpose.

Eagerly waiting for reply

Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20180724/9c30f533/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 9336 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20180724/9c30f533/attachment-0008.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4600 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20180724/9c30f533/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2257 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20180724/9c30f533/attachment-0009.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2000 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20180724/9c30f533/attachment-0009.png>