[Equest-users] Basement slightly below grade

[Keith Swartz via Equest-users]

Phil,

To add a little more detail to splitting the wall in two…

1.     Make a copy of the basement wall.

2.     Raise the bottom of one of those walls and make sure it has an above-grade construction.

3.     Lower the top of the other wall and make sure it has a below-grade construction.

Keith Swartz, PE | Senior Energy Engineer
Seventhwave
608.210.7123 seventhwave.org

From: John Aulbach via Equest-users [mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 11:55 AM
To: Philip Boutelle via Equest-users <equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Basement slightly below grade

Hi Phil:

If you are not as concerned with the 3-D rendering, I would have half the basement above ground, half below. A simple step. Thermodynamically, it should be fine.

John R. Aulbach, PE

On Saturday, January 21, 2017, 8:29:20 AM PST, Philip Boutelle via Equest-users <equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org<mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>> wrote:
Equest users,
I need to model a building that is built partially into a hillside, so that te basement is partially below grade. One wall of the basement is almost completely adjacent to earth, and the hill slopes pretty evenly down towards the opposite side, which is completely exposed. Any tips on how to reflect this in my model?
Thank for any help here,
-Phil



--

Phil Boutelle, PE, CEM     |   Energy Engineer
philboutelle at gmail.com<mailto:philboutelle at gmail.com>   |   M (831) 359-5268



_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG<mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20170123/26f5eefb/attachment-0004.htm>