[Equest-users] (Equest users) removal of warning & un mate hours

vishal jagdale jagdalevishal07 at gmail.com
Fri May 29 06:57:50 PDT 2015


*proposed model Warning*:-1) ZONE E32 East Perim Zn (G.E16)
             might have insufficient heating capability.
             Check that the SYSTEM or ZONE HEATING-CAPACITY plus this
             ZONEs BASEBOARD-RATING is adequate to maintain the ZONE
             specified DESIGN-HEAT-T for the calculated peak ZONE load
             (see LS-A or LS-B for the ZONE peak load.)


*baseline model Warning*:- 2) ZONE E13 ESE Perim Zn (G.ESE19)
             might have insufficient heating capability.
             Check that the SYSTEM or ZONE HEATING-CAPACITY plus this
             ZONEs BASEBOARD-RATING is adequate to maintain the ZONE
             specified DESIGN-HEAT-T for the calculated peak ZONE load
             (see LS-A or LS-B for the ZONE peak load.)

             SYSTEM Sixth FlrAC
             which supplies the above listed ZONE, has a design heating
             coil exit temperature, HEAT-SET-T,(plus any zone reheat)
             below its MAX-SUPPLY-T or the ZONE DESIGN-HEAT-T, which
             might account for the insufficient heating capability.

While both model showing overall  6000 unmate hours in *BEPS Building
Energy Performance* tab; whereas individual Zone doesnt show any unmate
hours in *SS-R zone performance summary*.
*can you guys help me out to resolve above issues..?  *

*Vishal*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20150529/c3f46e4a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list