[Equest-users] Water Source Heat Pump Efficiencies

Kelsey VanTassel KVanTassel at sustaineng.com
Fri Oct 1 08:23:27 PDT 2010


Hi Jeff,
Yes, you are right that heat pumps in cooling are not as efficient in cooling only as a chiller. The best system type/minimum efficiency combination to use depends on the purpose for the modeling. I do a lot of modeling where there is not as defined of guidelines for the baseline system as Appendix G, so my baseline tends to be what the building owner might choose to do instead. So a proposed Multistack heat pump system would get a bit of a penalty in cooling only mode, but would save energy in other modes against a chiller/boiler system.

Kelsey Van Tassel
Mechanical Engineer | kvantassel at sustaineng.com<mailto:kvantassel at sustaineng.com>
608.836.4488 ext. 20 | Fax: 608.836.4477

Sustainable Engineering Group
901 Deming Way, Suite 201
Madison, WI 53717
www.sustaineng.com<http://www.sustaineng.com/>


From: Jeff Seger [mailto:Jeff.Seger at megroup.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:09 AM
To: Kelsey VanTassel; Daniel Deese; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: RE: [Equest-users] Water Source Heat Pump Efficiencies

Daniel,
To answer your question directly, there is no baseline efficiency for that type of package (Just like Kelsey said).  If you're doing this for energy modeling purposes (comparing a baseline case vs. a proposed case), none of the ASHRAE baseline cases (Systems 1 through 8 from Appx G) require water source heat pumps, and that's why you don't find any required efficiencies. Based on the type of system you're describing (70 ton multistack), I'd think your baseline system would be a System 5 or 7.  We have some curves in Trace built up for larger capacity heat pump chiller, so if you want the efficiencies we have for those, let me know and I'll tell you.

Kelsey,
The problem with using the minimum efficiencies for water chilling packages is that the heat pumps are not nearly as efficient in cooling only as a typical centrifugal chiller...where they really excel is the combined mode when they produce chilled and hot water simultaneously...usually the COP you find manufacturers advertising is the sum of the cooling COP plus the heating COP.

Hope this helps,

Jeff Seger  EIT
M.E. GROUP / design + green
t: 816.531.2121 x3123
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CB6152.0C256160]<http://www.megroup.com/>



From: Kelsey VanTassel [mailto:KVanTassel at sustaineng.com]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:07 AM
To: Daniel Deese; equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] Water Source Heat Pump Efficiencies

No, you are right, there is nothing listed in the tables for water-source heat pump greater than 135,000 Btu/h. I think that's when you go to the water-chilling packages table and start looking at the minimum efficiencies for water-cooled chillers. That wouldn't cover the heating mode, though. Maybe someone else knows for sure.

Kelsey Van Tassel
Mechanical Engineer | kvantassel at sustaineng.com<mailto:kvantassel at sustaineng.com>
608.836.4488 ext. 20 | Fax: 608.836.4477

Sustainable Engineering Group
901 Deming Way, Suite 201
Madison, WI 53717
www.sustaineng.com<http://www.sustaineng.com/>


From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Deese
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 8:52 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Water Source Heat Pump Efficiencies

Hi all,

            I know they always say there's no such thing as a stupid question, but I've been looking through ASHRAE 90.1  table 6.8.1 as well as I know how, and I cannot find the required efficiency rating for a water source heat pump with a capacity greater than 135,000 BTU/hr.  We're trying to model Multistack heat pump/chillers, and we're using the 70-ton model, which correlates to about 840,000 BTU/hr.

            Has anyone ever modeled a water source heat pump larger than 135 MBH, and if so, which efficiency did you use?  I know I'm absolutely horrible at where's waldo, so there's a good chance I've just overlooked it.  Any help or advice is as always appreciated.  Thanks.

daniel

Daniel I. Deese, EI| CRB Consulting Engineers |
1255 Crescent Green, Suite 350 | Cary, NC 27518 |
P: 919-852-5443 | F: 919-852-5454 | X: 4543
Email: daniel.deese at crbusa.com<mailto:daniel.deese at crbusa.com>
________________________________________________________________________________________

This document may contain confidential information and is intended for use by the addressee only. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not transmit, copy, disclose, or utilize this communication in any manner. If you
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message.

ü Please consider the environment before printing this email.

________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attached file(s) are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom or to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary, and trade secret. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and discard the original message and any attachment(s).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101001/3e7e20bd/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11807 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101001/3e7e20bd/attachment.jpg>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list