[Bldg-sim] cheat-gpt

[chris.malcolm.yates at gmail.com]

Hi there,

 

Just a philosophical one; maybe even an existential one 😐

 

Given LLMs’ “autocorrect on steroids” abilities, what risk do we see ourselves exposed to as modelling professionals?

 

Let’s give an example…

*	A full LEED application including reports, unmet load tables, “error” reports. 
*	Not based on modelling – all reports and outputs generated with LLMs.

 

I think it would be relatively easy to do this, and present something that would stand up to review.

 

I think this poses the following questions:

1.	If our main value offering can be replaced with auto-complete, what is the value of what we’re doing, anyway?
2.	How can we improve the value?
3.	How can we protect that value?

 

I’d like to propose some solutions:

*	Tie Design stage models into the Operation of the building – calibrate
*	Rather than just submitting reports, place model input files into escrow with GBCI (or their local equivalent)

 

Controversial?

 

Cheers

Chris

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20251210/6e112c37/attachment.htm>