[TRNSYS-users] Solar PV System Analysis
Chaminda Ranaweera via TRNSYS-users
trnsys-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Sat May 28 03:44:49 PDT 2016
Dear David,
How to import (Type 551) in the TESS Electrical library.
Do we want to purchase it separately. I am unable to find
it here. Is it an add-on to Trnsys 17?
Thank You,
Chaminda
On Fri, 27 May 2016 13:41:49 -0500
David BRADLEY <d.bradley at tess-inc.com> wrote:
> Chaminda,
>
> I did not have a chance to look deeply into why you are
>getting different results if you split up your two PV
>simulations into two projects. However, I did notice a
>few things about your project in looking at it.
>
> First, I do not think it is adviseable to have two
>instances of Type99 that are both reading from the same
>file. This might be the cause of the different results
>when you move one of the PVs to its own project. Either
>make a copy of the weather file and give it a different
>name or just use one instance of Type99 that feeds its
>outputs to both of your PV simulations.
>
> Second, there are errors and inconsistencies in the
>solar radiation that is passed to the PV. In all cases
>the total radiation input is connected. However, in some
>case the beam radiation is connected from another
>component's output and in other cases it is not. The
>diffuse radiation input is not connected. This means that
>the PVs think that there is 0 diffuse radiation at all
>times. It is very important to be consistent about the
>radiation inputs to the PV and to make sure that all
>three (total, diffuse, and beam are all being passed to
>the PV from another Type.
>
> Third, while you can use Type30 as an approximation for
>shading on a PV it assumes that the impact of shading a
>PV is linear (i.e. if you shade half the PV you will get
>half the power output that you would from an unshaded
>PV). This linear shading impact is often not the case
>with PVs. There is an alternative model (Type551) in the
>TESS Electrical library that offers a somewhat improved
>model for shading PVs.
>
> kind regards,
>
> David
>
>
>
> On 05/27/2016 04:41, Chaminda Ranaweera via TRNSYS-users
>wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I made analysis for two surfaces. South and West. When I
>>run both West and South programs run in same Trnsys file,
>>then I get wrong result (Different result). But when I
>>run it in two different files, then I get another result.
>>Can anyone explain me the reason for this? Please help
>>me. Trnsys Hotline is no longer helping to me. I think
>>this problem is due to inherent problem of Trnsys. Before
>>sselling the product, they were replying to university.
>>Now they are silent.
>>
>> Can anyone help me. Actually I am doing my final
>>modelling for thesis. Nobody will give money to me to go
>>for training on Trnsys and nobody knows whether it is
>>useful or not.
>>
>> (I hereby attach Program File and results)
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>> Chaminda Ranaweera
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TRNSYS-users mailing list
>> TRNSYS-users at lists.onebuilding.org
>> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org
>
> --
> ***************************
> David BRADLEY
> Principal
> Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
> 22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
> Madison, WI 53703 USA
>
> P:+1.608.274.2577
>F:+1.608.278.1475
> d.bradley at tess-inc.com
>
> http://www.tess-inc.com
> http://www.trnsys.com
>
More information about the TRNSYS-users
mailing list