[Equest-users] [Bldg-sim] Existing Building LEED Baseline
Jack Vithayapun
jvithayapun at fs.fed.us
Fri Mar 12 08:55:14 PST 2010
If a building is going under LEED NC, does it not have to be rotated even
if it is existing? I think the argument for this had something to do with
the fact that the AE team could still modify the building envelope to make
it more efficient.
My understanding was that if a building was applied under LEED EB then it
would not have to be rotated.
I could be very wrong though.
-----------------------------------------
Jack Vithayapun
Building Systems Engineer
USDA Forest Service
1720 Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: (404)-347-2522
Fax: (404)-347-2399
Gregg Liddick <gliddick at theepstengroup.com>
Sent by: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
03/12/2010 11:42 AM
To
James Hansen <JHANSEN at ghtltd.com>, Erik Dyrr <erik.dyrr at gmail.com>,
"omoltay at mimtarch.com" <omoltay at mimtarch.com>
cc
"equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org" <equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>,
"bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org" <bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org>
Subject
Re: [Equest-users] [Bldg-sim] Existing Building LEED Baseline
James is correct regarding the windows ? they should be modeled using the
pre-renovation U-value and SHGC in the baseline case.
The baseline case should not be rotated for existing buildings, nor should
it be rotated if the construction is an addition. The basis of the
rotation requirement for new construction is to reward the project team
for choosing the most efficient orientation for a building and this is not
an option for existing buildings and additions.
Best Regards,
Gregg Liddick, EIT, LEED® AP
The Epsten Group, Inc.
429 Edgewood Avenue
Atlanta GA 30312
Phone: 404-577-0370 ext. 102
Fax: 404-577-1739
www.theepstengroup.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This transmission is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is
confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure.
If you are not the named addressee, you are NOT authorized to read, print,
retain, copy or disseminate this communication, its attachments or any
part of them. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this communication from all
computers. This communication does not form any contractual obligation on
behalf of the sender, the sender's employer, or the employer's parent
company, affiliates or subsidiaries.
From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of James Hansen
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:50 PM
To: Erik Dyrr; omoltay at mimtarch.com
Cc: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Existing Building LEED Baseline
I may be misreading one of your emails, but if you are doing a building
renovation to an existing building, even if you ARE changing out windows,
the baseline model retains the envelope characteristics of the existing
building. You don?t have to bring the baseline windows up to 90.1
standards unless it is a portion of the building that is being added under
the proposed work.
Also, check the archives ? I thought that some GBCI reviews of projects
have required the four orientations even for existing buildings.
GHT Limited
James Hansen, PE, LEED AP
Senior Associate
1010 N. Glebe Rd, Suite 200
Arlington, VA 22201-4749
703-338-5754 (Cell)
703-243-1200 (Office)
703-276-1376 (Fax)
www.ghtltd.com
From: bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Erik Dyrr
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 8:25 PM
To: omoltay at mimtarch.com
Cc: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Existing Building LEED Baseline
If the windows are existing to remain, then you are correct that they
would be the same in the proposed and baseline. If you change out windows
then the baseline would be min performance per ASHRAE.
I think your assumption about not changing the windows by orientation is
correct. I am not sure you even need to do four orientations if the
building is existing.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM, <omoltay at mimtarch.com> wrote:
Dear All,
Just want to have your opinions about this: Since the building we are
applying for LEED certification is an existing building (and there are no
additions), the building envelope in our baseline model is identical to
the existing conditions in real life. We have interpreted this to also
include the SHGC on the windows and any fixed shading devices on the
windows, so these we have also modeled as existing in real life.
I assume this would further mean that when we are doing the baseline
simulation in four rotations, we do not need to change anything with the
SHGC's on the windows in each rotation.
Although according to Appendix G I believe this should be the way (since
the remark involving existing buildings is printed as the last entry in
the table), I still have some doubts as in the LEED NC reference guide
they have only printed that remark for the building envelope involving
opaque surfaces, and the criteria involving windows seems to be
independent of this (on p.270).
Thanks for any replies,
Omer Moltay, LEED AP
Mimta Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the
property of GHT Limited. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
me immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to ght at ghtltd.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all
attachments. Thank you._______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100312/8c681876/attachment.htm>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list