[UA] Traveling Unicorns

[Rayburn, Russell E.]

-----Original Message-----
From: ua-bounces at lists.unknown-armies.com
[mailto:ua-bounces at lists.unknown-armies.com] On Behalf Of Ysidro
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:27 PM
To: The Unknown Armies RPG Mailing List
Subject: Re: [UA] Traveling Unicorns


	On 8/11/06, Rayburn, Russell E. <RERayburn at columbus.gov> wrote: 

		Schweet!
		 
		I thought it might be a urbanomancer taunting a
cliomancer... the clio goes for a charge only to find the object of
their veneration missing.  After a bit of a stink, the urbanomancer
brings the object back, but with a bit of a taunt.
		
		 


	Is it really back?  Maybe it's a copy of the unicorn and it took
the Urbanomancer awhile to get it into place.  So he writes up the note
to make the tiger go back to sleep.  Meanwhile we have one pissed off
Clio in the background.
	
	Can Clio's even charge off of objects?  I can't remember and I'm
too lazy to pull out my first edition book.
	
	Greg M 
	 
	Feeling lazy myself... just thinking that if the object had
historical significance of some kind, then the clio should be able to
hit it.  
	 
	Alternatively, the unicorn statue could be an integral part of
the historically significant place.  Removing it "desecrates" the
place... at least lowering the available charge, and in the case of a
minor eliminating it completely.
	 
	Say, for instance, a clio goes to the biograph theater in
Chicago ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biograph_Theater ) to get some of
that lady in red goodness.  Then, let's also say an urbanomancer gets
sick of the clio and decides to encourage her to find a new zip code.
So the urbanomancer has the place condemned and bulldozed.  The
resulting parking lot would still have some historical significance, but
not as much as if the theater was still there.
	 
	I could be ( and probably am ) just talking out my ass though. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.unknown-armies.com/pipermail/ua-unknown-armies.com/attachments/20060811/225ab70e/attachment-0002.htm>