[UA] No such thing as a perfect setting

[Itay Horev]

Hello

  I thought about it after reading the first message in the "my
  game/experiment" thread.
  No setting is perfect. No one ever starts a campaign without taking
  something out of the book, or adding some of his own. What's that
  thing, for you, in UA? What's the thing that you don't like in the
  setting, or that was missing? Even if you don't run, what plans
  would you have done if you would have run a UA game?

  For me, it's the size of the invisible clergy. When thinking of the
  archetypes, Jung immediately comes to mind, and his archetypes were
  being passed along from generation to generation for tens of
  thousands of years now, if not more. It seems immpossible that in
  all that time, less than 333 archetypes were created, or that less
  than 333 people occupied the relevant spots in the invisible clergy.
  More than that - when thinking of the Yungian archetypes, they
  include more than what the UAish archetypes seem to include.
  Archetypes like the water, for instance.
  So I decided that the Invisible Clergy won't be limited to 333
  members, but rather - That ascension would happen when a certain
  archetype would join in. I haven't decided which archetype that
  would be yet, though "The Cosmos" sounds like a good one.

--
Best regards,
 Itay                          mailto:itay at corky.net

 P.S
 Greg, John - Don't feel obliged to answer this one :)


_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua