[UA] Re: UA digest, Vol 1 #979 - 16 msgs

[Greg Stolze]

>Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:13:43 -0800 (PST)
>From: Chad Underkoffler <chadu at yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: [UA] Ascension of the Magdalene
>To: "Unknown Armies" <ua at lists.uchicago.edu>
>Reply-To: ua at lists.uchicago.edu
>
>> > So what do folks think that the archetype of the Magus
>> > became?
>>
>>Also, the main text claims Archetypes never go away, but the UA
>>box on p. 5 claims the Magus Archetype hasn't survived to the
>>present day. Isn't that anti-canon, as well as contradictory to
>>the text here?

They don't go away.  They do get replaced.  You can never bring down (say)
The Mother without offering something else (The Caregiver?) in her place.

The Magus probably got replaced by The Scientist, but that's not canon.
It's just how I'd do it IMUAC.

-G.

As it turns out, my memory is far less detail-oriented than my imagination.

www.waylay.com
www.thehungersite.com



_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua