[UA] Stupid Props...
Eric Eves
eeves at erskine.edu
Mon Mar 4 05:44:56 PST 2002
David M Jacobs wrote:
>
> At 09:57 PM 3/03/02 -0800, Brian Covey wrote:
>
> > I'm also making a prop and forcing the player that uses it to
> > actually wear it at the table. I'm sure it will be fun, but damn,
> > there's a lot of surface area to be covered with bizarre glyphs on
> > your average barbie doll...
>
> What kind of fetish could a Barbie doll be? Perhaps it could deprive
> the target of any sexual allure, Barbie dolls being notoriously
> lacking in this respect?
Perhaps, but that's not all.
She's tied to a combination of the attempt to create sexual desire, part
of the whole "girl next door" image, relentless mundanity and normality
of a sort, a certain kind of glamor, impossible to achieve hopes of
physical "perfection", and sexual frigidity (symbolized in part by the
lack of primary sexual characteristics).
There are also possible ties to the WECHBY, and/or to her and Ken as a
twisted, castrated example of the Lovers.
Good enough?
_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua
More information about the UA
mailing list