[UA] "I believes in Science!" (but Do You Believe In Love?)
Epoch
msulliva at wso.williams.edu
Thu Jun 14 18:41:20 PDT 2001
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Kevin Mowery wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Epoch" <msulliva at wso.williams.edu>
> To: <ua at lists.uchicago.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [UA] "I believes in Science!"
>
> > The fundamental axiom of science is "what is observed empirically serves
> > as a predictor for the future." That's as unprovable as anything in
> > religion, and as much of a leap of faith. It's also susceptible to
> > cultural whims in terms of how much we believe it -- it was /much/ less
> > accepted a few centuries ago.
>
> Well, let's take a reasonable example: dropping a pencil off a table.
> Empirical observation says it'll drop toward the earth if it's not stopped.
> That happens so consistently I can pretty safely call it a fact.
And here's where we trip up. You gotta jump back a step, man. /Why/ can
you call it a fact (By which I presume you mean: it's a fact that
generally pencils fall when dropped) because it's happened consistantly
in the past?
Answer: Because you've made a leap of faith that says "what is observed
empirically serves as a predictor for the future." Or, perhaps, a better
way of saying it would be "what is observed empirically shows a general
case."
Mike
--
"Like H.P. Lovecraft's dark and inbred Maine, only with grits!"
- Greg Stolze
_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua
More information about the UA
mailing list