[UA] Lavomancy

[Bailey Watts]

>(I begin to think that magick schools that get written up should have a 
>place where they explicitly state the paradox, because it seems like half 
>the time there isn't one, and the other half I don't recognize it.  I'm 
>uncertain which this is)
>

This is a little peeve of mine but an important one that cause me to rewrite 
a couple of the schools.

The paradox fuels the magic.  Without the paradox there is no magic.  The 
obsession with the paradox gives the oomph to the magic.  If the paradox 
wouldn't exist without the magic the school needs a rewrite in my opinion.

Recently came up with a sex magician with the paradox of unattainable 
because he is available.  Would amoromancy fit for that or not.  I have not 
PoMoMa.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua