[UA] Uncomfortable Chess Symbology

[Eves, Eric D.]

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory Paul Stolze [mailto:holycrow at mindspring.com]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 8:32 AM
To: ua at lists.uchicago.edu
<<Subject: Re: [UA] Uncomfortable Chess Symbology


At 03:18 PM 09/24/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeattleTimes.woa/wa/got
>oArticle?text_only=0&zsection_id=268448406&document_id=134234718

"This year's event, in other words, is no one-knight stand."

>From the article, by Marc Ramirez.

If I was in Seattle, and I met Marc Ramirez, and I slapped him in the face
and said "That's for the line about the 'one-knight stand'," do you think a
jury there would convict me?  Or would the D.A. plea bargain it to make
more room for serial killers?

-G.
Sankyu

http://www.thehungersite.com/index.html

>>
Oh, you could get off, you just need a jury of your "peers".  I know none of
us would find you guilty, let alone other designers of bizzare roleplaying
games.  That is, if they could find enough to even try you.

_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua