Sleepers vs. TNI (was Re: [UA] HUSH HUSH...)

[Chad Underkoffler]

> From: "Eric Brennan" <thebrennans at starpower.net>
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 21:03:57 -0500
>
> I loved HUSH HUSH, but I didn't like it as much as I liked 
> LG&$.  I'm thinking of writing a review for RPG.net or 
> something.  For one thing, the _power_ level of the Sleepers 
> bothered me...they seem just a little too beefy, but maybe 
> that's just my preconception of the butting up against that
> of the writers.  Or it could be that since many Sleepers work
> alone they have to be able to handle a cabal of PCs.

That last bit is important. Another thing to remember is that
the Sleepers are um, er, ah, rather older than TNI, whichever
way you cut it. (And it can be cut finely, at least 3 ways.
Shhhh.) 

I figure that the fact that the Sleeprs have been around longer
means that they've had more time to assemble their resources.
Plus, it seems that the Sleepers can absorb entire cabals into
their structure much easier than TNI could. 



=====
Chad Underkoffler [chadu at yahoo.com]
http://www.geocities.com/chadu/index.html
"Hold your breath. Make a wish. Count to three."
  -- Willy Wonka

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua