[UA] What You Want

[Carl L. Congdon]

Stacy Stroud wrote:


I like the titles . . . but can you give me an idea of what would go into

> these books?  If I may make the obvious comparison, I'm sure we've all
> heard the complaints WW has gotten over the non-content of their
> "splatbooks."  It's clear from UA that the schools of magick are not
> coherent organizations or even consistent mindsets -- so why a whole
> sourcebook for each?  The old schedule included a "Postmodern Magick"
> sourcebook; it seems that would be the place to put new spells and such.  I
> could see a Sect of the Naked Goddess book to match the TNI book, but none
> of the other schools is so strongly tied to a specific group of people.

Reading this after my other post, I have to agree. Put all the magick stuff into
one big book, including more info on archetypes, and then maybe put out a
"dossier" book on the big players in the Occult Underground. Stick the New
Inquisition in with the Sect o' Naked Goddess and Mak Attax, maybe with a chart
stating how relations are currently between each group.

> >       "Godwalker" - A UA novel
>
> Ooh ooh ooh.  Yes yes yes.

Make it as good as "Pierced Heart" was, at least, and you got yourself a deal.

*Now* the rest can stay as a tree!

--
Poets, priests, and politicians
Have words to spend for their positions
Words that scream for your submission
And no one's jamming their transmission...
And when their eloquence escapes me
Their logic ties me up and rapes me
 -The Police, "De Do Do Do, De Da Da Da"