[UA] Clarification on the IC

[Twist0059 at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/21/99 6:55:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
chris.crouch at dsto.defence.gov.au writes:

>  You'd think so, but we don't seem to see it much.  Having an IC member
>  > pissed with you has /serious/ repercussions, and I wouldn't think that
>  > many Godwalkers would live for more than a few days, if they really were
>  > that kind of target.
>  > 
>  > My suggestions:
>   <snip>
>  
>  Something just struck me - presumably the Ascended incarnation of an
>  Archetype is still bound (even more strongly) by the taboos of the 
Archetype
>  (is this the case). If this is the case, then presumably some Archetypes
>  have taboos that would prevent them from trying to stop another Godwalker
>  from taking their spot - although I'm hard pressed to think of any 
examples.
>  


It's really a catch-22.  How can you represent the utter ideal of some image 
when you try and knock that image down?  It'd probably be seen as some kind 
of treason against your "child", come to think of it.






-Twist

_______________________________________________
UA mailing list
UA at lists.uchicago.edu
http://lists.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/ua