[lustre-devel] [PATCH v2] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: Removes potential null dereference
James Simmons
jsimmons at infradead.org
Mon May 16 11:16:38 PDT 2016
> This looks wrong - You return -EINVAL from sptlrpc_pack_user_desc, but then
> the caller checks "!desc". Desc will not be null, since you've returned
> -EINVAL.
Actually 'if (!desc)' is equal to 'if (desc != 0). Yes it can be confusing.
I recommend 'if (desc < 0)' instead to make it clearer what is being
tested for.
> - Patrick
>
> On 05/16/2016 09:17 AM, Lidza Louina wrote:
> > The lustre_msg_buf method could return NULL. Subsequent code didn't
> > check if it's null before using it. This patch adds two checks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lidza Louina <lidza.louina at oracle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> > index 187fd1d..e6fedc3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> > @@ -2195,6 +2195,8 @@ int sptlrpc_pack_user_desc(struct lustre_msg *msg, int
> > offset)
> > struct ptlrpc_user_desc *pud;
> >
> > pud = lustre_msg_buf(msg, offset, 0);
> > + if (!pud)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > pud->pud_uid = from_kuid(&init_user_ns, current_uid());
> > pud->pud_gid = from_kgid(&init_user_ns, current_gid());
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
> > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
> > index 37c9f4c..51741c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
> > @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ int plain_alloc_reqbuf(struct ptlrpc_sec *sec,
> > {
> > __u32 buflens[PLAIN_PACK_SEGMENTS] = { 0, };
> > int alloc_len;
> > + int desc;
> >
> > buflens[PLAIN_PACK_HDR_OFF] = sizeof(struct plain_header);
> > buflens[PLAIN_PACK_MSG_OFF] = msgsize;
> > @@ -574,8 +575,12 @@ int plain_alloc_reqbuf(struct ptlrpc_sec *sec,
> > lustre_init_msg_v2(req->rq_reqbuf, PLAIN_PACK_SEGMENTS, buflens, NULL);
> > req->rq_reqmsg = lustre_msg_buf(req->rq_reqbuf, PLAIN_PACK_MSG_OFF, 0);
> > - if (req->rq_pack_udesc)
> > - sptlrpc_pack_user_desc(req->rq_reqbuf, PLAIN_PACK_USER_OFF);
> > + if (req->rq_pack_udesc) {
> > + desc = sptlrpc_pack_user_desc(req->rq_reqbuf,
> > + PLAIN_PACK_USER_OFF);
> > + if (!desc)
> > + return desc;
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
>
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list