Hi Guys,<br><br>Here all the .inp files. 1.inp is the base and 2.inp is the proposed.<br><br>Thank you,<br><br>Lee<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Lee Chorney <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leec@alliedconsulting.net" target="_blank">leec@alliedconsulting.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi All,<br><br><br>I recently did a model where I had the same system in both base and proposed but I changed the R-Value from 4 (base) to 20 (proposed). I also changed the window U-value from .80 (base) to .35 (proposed). After I did the run, I saw only a 5% savings between the heating and cooling use in the model. When I looked at the loads I saw the base had twice as much cooling and heating load than the proposed. Does any know why the energy savings would only be 5% when you have a huge difference between the cooling and heating loads?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br><br>Lee<br>
</blockquote></div><br>