<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Droid Serif";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1756434132;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:330881044 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:\F0B7;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Pete,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">The performance curves are one item to check out if the RTUs are greatly oversized.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">A couple other things come to mind:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#1F497D"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><![endif]><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">If they originally had lab areas with high make up air requirements, the RTUs could be greatly oversized and operating at a low enough load with the
reduced SHGC to bring on hot gas by-pass (within the simulation).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><![if !supportLists]><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#1F497D"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><![endif]><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Check the minimum % cfm of the VAV boxes. If it’s a high % like 60%-70% which I’ve seen in the past, you could be bringing on reheat, which will
increase cooling load in addition to reheat energy.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Mike Busman<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chevron Energy Solutions<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> equest-users-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Bruce Easterbrook<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 16, 2012 7:04 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Peter Baumstark<br>
<b>Cc:</b> equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Equest-users] Unexpected Custom SHGC Results<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:13.5pt">If you are manipulating the envelope you should be looking at the envelope reports. Specifically LS-B, then LS-C. This is the only way you will see the actual effect of the windows
before the data is lumped with everything else. You will also notice the elephants in the room, lights and occupants. Occupants are indirect and equal outside air. Have the lights been upgraded? RTU are notorious for being poorly set-up and are the first
thing a building manager plays with when the bills get too high, they turn down or off the outside air. You haven't mentioned energy bills, you really need them when you are doing this kind of work. They are a check on the accuracy of your assumptions in
eQuest and what is actually going on in the building. You won't likely get that close to actual costs but they are a good order of magnitude indicator. Check SV-A which will give you people counts and outside air. If your lights or your people are out,
or both you won't see the window changes in the gross numbers.<br>
After that it is trouble shooting. Most problems in eQuest are input errors or incorrect assumptions. It is quite accurate when you get everything right in your input. But it is a model and you are using canned weather so everything is relative not exact.<br>
As for the naysayers, some people like Ford and some like GM, but in the end they are just 4 wheels to get you down the road. If you can't keep your wheels out of the ditch it is not their fault.<br>
Bruce Easterbrook P.Eng.<br>
Abode Engineering</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 15/07/2012 08:47 PM, Peter Baumstark wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">It's an interesting problem. With this model, no matter what I do, if I manually change the SHGC or SC (if I use the U-Value method), or if I select different glazing types from the library
(with different SHGC values), no matter what face of the building I change it, I get an increase in overall monthly energy use with a lower SHGC.<br>
<br>
I built the model through a zone by activity area method that pretty closely matches the various zones of the building. It's a VAV with terminal reheat system (1995 Trane Intellipaks), and I entered actual economizer, static pressure and SAT settings. Airflow
matches as-built design drawings.<br>
<br>
I tried using other eQUEST models I've built for other customers using similar methods, changed the location to San Jose, and ran window cases and results were as expected.<br>
<br>
I'm coming to believe that one issue with the building in question is the RTUs seem over sized relative to the use patterns and internal heat gains. This building previously had various lab areas, then was purchased by another customer with lower internal
heat load rates, but they kept the same RTUs.<br>
<br>
Could it be possible that the lower heat gains from better fenestration products could place the RTUs at a more inefficient spot on its performance curve? I've ran into similar issues with chilled water systems, but never looked at DOE-2 performance curves
for DX units.<br>
<br>
Pete<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<hr size="1" width="100%" align="center">
</span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Paul Diglio
<a href="mailto:paul.diglio@sbcglobal.net"><paul.diglio@sbcglobal.net></a><br>
<b>To:</b> Joe Huang <a href="mailto:yjhuang@whiteboxtechnologies.com"><yjhuang@whiteboxtechnologies.com></a>; CleanTech Analytics
<a href="mailto:jeremiah@cleantechanalytics.com"><jeremiah@cleantechanalytics.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org">equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org</a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sun, July 15, 2012 5:03:54 PM<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Equest-users] Unexpected Custom SHGC Results</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Joe:<br>
<br>
I agree. I find the comment to be more than mildly offensive. <br>
<br>
I have the same experience that funky modeling results usually are the result of flawed inputs or depending on too many eQuest defaults.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Paul Diglio, CEM, CBCP<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">87 Fairmont Avenue<br>
New Haven, CT 06513<br>
203-415-0082<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.pdigliollc.com" target="_blank">www.pdigliollc.com</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<hr size="1" width="100%" align="center">
</span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Joe Huang
<a href="mailto:yjhuang@whiteboxtechnologies.com"><yjhuang@whiteboxtechnologies.com></a><br>
<b>To:</b> CleanTech Analytics <a href="mailto:jeremiah@cleantechanalytics.com"><jeremiah@cleantechanalytics.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org">equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org</a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sun, July 15, 2012 7:21:54 PM<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Equest-users] Unexpected Custom SHGC Results<br>
</span><br>
I've found this comment to be mildly offensive as well as showing a lack of understanding about how heat gains ultimately get translated to cooling energy consumption. It's extremely hard for me to believe that eQUEST or DOE-2 has been flawed for 25 years
in modeling something as fundamental as solar heat gain through windows. In all the decades I've used DOE-2 to analyze window performance for DOE's EnergyStar Program as well as numerous other projects, whenever the results did not match or ran counter to
first-principle expectations, it was always because there was some other factor that have been overlooked or ignored, chief among them being the size of the HVAC system, its configuration, and control strategy. Locations with mild cooling loads, such as San
Jose, are particularly sensitive to such system interactions. Were both runs done using "autosizing"? What<br>
kind of a system was modeled - VAV or CAV ? Did the model have an economizer? What were the HEAT-CONTROL and COOL-CONTROL strategies ? etc. It's far too early to lay blame on the DOE-2 algorithms.<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
<br>
On 7/14/2012 1:41 PM, CleanTech Analytics wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666">Just admit it- eQuest is flawed, you don't have to make up things to protect it- </span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666">If it is a mistake to use the percent points rather then percent reduced from the abrataty eQuest assumption from 1999 window specs than the it should have reduced solar heat
gain by more then his product even provided- Using the 33 percentage points but used the 33% should have provided him over stated cooling reduction, (and extra added heating consumption tradeoff) </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666">O- and FYI
</span>LBL<span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666"> window does glass U-value not shading, ware-as
</span>LBL<span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666"> optics can be used for film coefficients and used to create a custom glass type in window, but do not do any calculations for "shading"</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666">I say you try the same model in Energy Plus or TRNSYS and see if the results differ.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#336666"><br clear="all">
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#999999">Jeremiah D. Crossett</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#999999">CleanTech Analytics</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#999999">503-688-8951</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.cleantechanalytics.com" target="_blank"><i><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#999999">www.cleantechanalytics.com</span></i></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><img border="0" id="_x0000_i1027" src="http://cleantechanalytics.com/images/stories/cleantech%20analytics%20120.PNG"><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p align="center" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:8.5pt;font-family:"Droid Serif","serif";color:#CCCCCC">This document may contain valuable information proprietary to CleanTech Analytics which is private
and confidential. It may not be shared, copied, stored or transmitted in any form without the prior written consent of CleanTech Analytics</span></i><b><o:p></o:p></b></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Liam O'Brien <<a href="mailto:obrien_liam@hotmail.com" target="_blank">obrien_liam@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Pete, <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I don't have a ton of experience with detailed modelling of shades in eQUEST, specifically, but two things that could be at play:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">- The claim from the manufacturer sounds like it's not intended to universal in absolute terms. Also, it would be more conservative to reduce the SHGC by 3<span style="font-size:10.0pt">3 percent than 33 <u>percentage points</u> (as you
did) if you're going to take this simplified approach. Therefore, it would be closer to SHGC=0.44. Subtle but significant. You could try using software that specializes in window/shade performance like LBNL Window or Parasol to try to characterize the performance
of your specific shade-glazing combination</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">- Depending on the operating conditions and construction of the building, there's a chance your results aren't ridiculous. If shades intercept transmitted solar radiation, then a lot of that energy will almost immediately transfer to the
air via convection. If you have thermally massive interior surfaces, there's a chance your building could actually perform better without those shades because the air conditioning won't kick in till later. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Liam<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="2" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:51:02 -0700<br>
From: <a href="mailto:pbaumstark@sbcglobal.net" target="_blank">pbaumstark@sbcglobal.net</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org" target="_blank">equest-users@lists.onebuilding.org</a><br>
Subject: [Equest-users] Unexpected Custom SHGC Results <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Hello,<br>
<br>
I have an "L" shaped building with the point of the "L" facing North. The inside of the "L" has both NE and NW surfaces, that include a high amount of glass, which heats up the perimeter building spaces considerably during the summer. Glazing is single pane
tinted.<br>
<br>
The customer wants to install some Verisol SilverScreen shades in these windows. According to the manufacturer, the SHGC will reduce by about 33%. I modeled in eQUEST, window properties in these windows to have an SHGC of 0.67 and ran an EEM reducing SHGC
to 0.34, and got an increase in cooling load and fan load year round, even in the summer months.<br>
<br>
Am I seeing this wrong? I can't figure out how I could possible get results like this?<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
Pete<br>
San Jose, CA<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________ Equest-users mailing list
<a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org</a> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
<a href="mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Equest-users mailing list<br>
<a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">
EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Equest-users mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org" target="_blank">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG" target="_blank">EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <br>
Joe Huang White Box Technologies, Inc. 346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D Moraga, CA 94556 (o) (925)388-0265 (c) (510)928-2683
<a href="http://www.whiteboxtechnologies.com" target="_blank">www.whiteboxtechnologies.com</a> "Building energy simulations at your fingertips"<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Equest-users mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a href="mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>