<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
that would be 500 unmet hours.<br>
<br>
the bigger leed review problem i've had is when i have more unmet hours
in one category in the proposed (like 200 unmet in cooling) and fewer
unmet hours in the other (like 0 in heating) but the baseline is
opposite. certain leed reviewers think this is a problem. the 90.1
requirement addresses the unmet hours per the entire building design
(both heating and cooling) not heating and cooling individually.<br>
<br>
On 7/7/11 7:49 AM, Brad Robinson wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:1310050159.34584.YahooMailNeo@web30503.mail.mud.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">
<div>For LEED compliance under ASHRAE 90.1, are the 300 unmet hours
the sum of all the unmet hours in each zone, or the peak per zone? In
other words if I have 250 unmet hours in one zone and 250 unmet hours
in another zone, does this comply, or is it considered 500 unmet hours
total? By zones, I mean thermal zones served by the same air handling
unit. Thanks.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Brad Robinson</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org">http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org</a>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG">EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@ONEBUILDING.ORG</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>