[Equest-users] Baseline Fan Energy Very High

David Eldridge DEldridge at grummanbutkus.com
Mon Jul 22 09:49:27 PDT 2019


What's the ratio of the kW/cfm for the two cases, and the ratio of total cfm?

i.e. as you are proposing, if the two systems run at the same sequence of operation to get a 6x factor of reduction you'd have to be some combination of 2x the cfm in the baseline and 3x the power use per CFM - if that's not accurate then the likely culprit is the sequence which may be allowing the proposed case to run fewer hours or running much longer at part-load if the proposed case has that capability - maybe add a report to see the load profile for the two cases.

Another check is that unmet hours and temperature plots in the SS-O report were consistent between the two cases providing equal comfort. Reviewing the SS-O can help you find an instance where the temperature control sequence isn't equivalent resulting in more runtime for the baseline case.

A third check - were the two cases showing reasonable increase in efficiency for the proposed case of the other end-uses for cooling, heating, lighting, etc - verify there isn't a stray heat gain causing increased run-time in one case.

David


David S. Eldridge, Jr., P.E., LEED AP BD+C, BEMP, BEAP, HBDP
Associate

Direct: (847) 316-9224 | Mobile: (773) 490-5038

Grumman/Butkus Associates | 820 Davis Street, Suite 300 | Evanston, IL 60201
Energy Efficiency Consultants and Sustainable Design Engineers

grummanbutkus.com<http://grummanbutkus.com/> | Blog<http://grummanbutkus.com/blog> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/pages/GrummanButkus-Associates/1385285015032526> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/grummanbutkus>

From: Equest-users [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Ross-Bain via Equest-users
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 2:05 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Baseline Fan Energy Very High

Hi All,
To those of you who regularly and graciously contribute your knowledge to this site, we all owe you a huge debt of gratitude. Thank you.

I am stumped. Usually, in my experience, following the standard Baseline process of establishing [ASHRAE max] fan power and applying that value to eQuest in kW/cfm, the resulting difference between Baseline and Proposed is evident but not super big.

In this case, on a small project with 6 x under 5-ton split HP systems, the Baseline fan energy use is, like, over 6 times bigger than the Proposed. I have exhausted every check and iteration I can think of and cannot find out why or how this occurs. As-is, the energy savings is incredible on fan power alone and I know it is not right.

Any thoughts or similar experiences with this circumstance?

Thanks!

Jeff Ross-Bain, BCxP, BEMP, LEED Fellow, MSc
President

[RBGB_Logo_Hi-Res]<http://www.rbgb.com/>

Charleston:  843-779-9229
Atlanta:  404-220-8955
www.rbgb.com<http://www.rbgb.com/>

Maximizing Building Performance

Join us at GREENBUILD 2019<https://www.greenbuildexpo.com/en/register.html> where two RBGB projects will be showcased.

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D53CAF.A3CD6CF0]<https://www.greenbuildexpo.com/en/register.html>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20190722/2fe086cf/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3121 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20190722/2fe086cf/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5025 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20190722/2fe086cf/attachment-0005.jpg>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list