[Equest-users] sequencing chillers using Equipment Controls

[Daric Adair]

Chris;

The issue is not with Equipment Controls but with the Water Side economizer ‘chiller’.

I thought the water side economizer was an all or nothing element, so your mention of Equipment Controls gave me hope that someone had found a way around this limitation. But I’m afraid it wouldn’t appear that’s true.

Per the Help files ‘ Volume 2: Dictionary<mk:@MSITStore:c:\eQUEST%203-65%20Data\Help\DOE22\DOE-2.chm::/Docs/volume2dictionary.htm> > HVAC Components<mk:@MSITStore:c:\eQUEST%203-65%20Data\Help\DOE22\DOE-2.chm::/Docs/hvaccomponents.htm> > CHILLER<mk:@MSITStore:c:\eQUEST%203-65%20Data\Help\DOE22\DOE-2.chm::/Docs/chiller1.htm>’  and ‘Chiller Water-Economizer’ :
The program assumes a water-side economizer is used in an “all or nothing” mode. If the water-side economizer can handle the entire cooling load, then it will be used. Otherwise, the loop will use its other chillers. A water-side economizer cannot precool the return flow prior to entering the chillers.

The “all or nothing” mode precludes the use of an EQUIP-CTRL sequence to coordinate the operation of an economizer chiller with other chillers. If you list a water-side economizer chiller in an EQUIP-CTRL sequence, it will be ignored.
…

So, Sad day. Super creative – which is awesome and exciting. But can’t do it. bummer


Thanks,
DARIC R ADAIR PE, CEM, BEMP
Mechanical Engineer, Energy Analyst

Henderson Engineers
Tel (913) 742-5530
daric.adair at hendersonengineers.com<mailto:daric.adair at hendersonengineers.com>

Licensed in KS

From: Chris Hadlock <cjhadlock at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 4:05 PM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] sequencing chillers using Equipment Controls

Hi All,

I'm using eQuest version 3.65 and am having trouble with sequencing my chillers - I've combed through the archives but haven't found anything that has helped.

I have 3 chillers in my model, a water-side economizing chiller and two air-cooled scroll chillers. I would like to control them such that my WS economizing chiller runs up to a certain capacity only (175 Tons = 2.1 MBtu/h). Without any controls, eQuest is ignoring the capacity I have entered, and is meeting my building's entire cooling load. Beyond the 2.1 MBtu/h, I would like my 2 other chillers to run to meet the remaining load.

I've created an Equipment Control (and selected it on my CHW loop) that has my WS Econo Chiller as sequence no. 1 with a max load of 2.1 (I believe units of MBtu/h). Then I have my other chillers as sequence 2/3 and left max loads as "999". I've played around with the "Max Load" values and also the "Loads Through" value and nothing I do changes the outcome. Is anyone able to help me figure out why eQuest is not capping my WS Econo Chiller at the 2.1 MBtu/h and why it continues to meet the entire cooling load (with a peak approaching 4 MBtu/h)?

Thank you in advance.

---
Chris Hadlock, M.A.Sc<http://m.a.sc/>., P.Eng, LEED AP BD+C
Founder & Senior Energy Consultant

HADLOCK CONSULTING
201 Candlewood Cr
Waterloo, ON N2L5T3
tel: (519) 804-1223
cel: (226) 343-5599
www.hadlockconsulting.ca<http://www.hadlockconsulting.ca/>

________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of Henderson Engineers, Inc. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify administrator at hendersonengineers.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20181024/3321b8ab/attachment.html>