[Equest-users] Help needed regarding results.

[Sitha mahalakshmi Pathuri via Equest-users]

Hello Every one ,

Thank you very much for your valuable support.

I have switched on day lighting and tried to take in multiple zones to
increase the no of sensor points.

But yet the comparative analysis results are pretty much the same.I
couldn't trace out the defect.
I will go through The GRIHA guideline as well .

Thank you,
Sitha.




On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Sharad Kumar via Equest-users <
equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org> wrote:

> Hi Sitha,
>
> I mean you are trying to analyse the WWR based analysis on different
> facades.
> Try configuring out different percentages of glazing percentage of the
> wall on different facades and analyse it.
> If one has to get the same overall load then one can increase equipment or
> lighting load by iterating it.
> For purpose you can have different WWR on different facades.
> As per me in Northern hemisphere of the globe one can get the best as
> facade as North west which can have the best  varying WWR and South or
> south west as worst facade which can have least varying WWR.
> For reference you can have a look at the GRIHA guideline volume-3 as it
> has that section which has window glazing and WWR based insolation and
> other discussions.
>
> So as per me if you have to take least amount of WWR then choose
> south-west.
>
>
> *Thanks,*
> Sharad.Kumar|Engineer.
> Green Horizon Consulting LLP.
> Gurgaon.
> India.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Sitha mahalakshmi Pathuri via
> Equest-users <equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have been doing an academic project where i am trying to find out the
> best percentage of facade glazing which results in optimal energy
> consumption in IT office building.
>
> Is there a possibility of doing parametric studies pertaining to change in
> facade glazing percentage or lets say WWR.
>
> I tried a floor plan with three different types of glasses and different
> percentages.
> But as i reduce the facade percentage from 100% to 30%  the energy
> consumption report says that there is reduction in energy consumption.but
> There is no difference in lighting loads . the only change in the report is
> for space cooling. The reduction in the glazing definitely results in
> increase in lighting loads in a fully conditioned office building.
>
> This is not being projected in the results.could some one help me on how
> to proceed in this regard.
>
> Thanking you,
>
> P.Sitha
> Pursuing M.Arch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20160515/77c71650/attachment-0005.htm>