[Equest-users] Demand Direct Process Load
Brian Fountain
bfountain at greensim.com
Thu Oct 1 12:43:09 PDT 2015
I would look at your PS-E report to see when the peak loads are
occurring in your proposed and baseline models. I suspect that the
slight shift in when the peak demand is being set changes the breakdown
of that peak demand.
On 01/10/2015 2:18 PM, Eric Fischel J. wrote:
>
> Hello David, thanks for the tip on the process loads.
>
> In the following table the results show that the KWh for the
> receptacle equipment is the same but we get -15.4029 in demand saving.
> (We triple check schedules and w/sf they are exactly the same)
>
> Additionally we use the “Exterior Usage” and “Task Lighting”
> categories in the Electric Meter Direct loads ( for water pump,
> elevator, exterior lighting), using the same Schedule and Load (KW).
> As you can see the show saving in Demand.
>
> What would we change In the *.SIM file to get the same results in the
> process load?
>
> Thanks again for your help!
>
> *Ing. Eric Fischel J. *
>
> Tel.: (506) 2222-7529
>
> Fax: (506) 2256-5608
>
> From USA: 1-305-433-3668
>
> Calle 30, Avenida 0 y 2. San José, Costa Rica
>
> Logo CTS firma//*Description: LEEDAP_BDCbw*****//
>
> /Este correo puede contener información protegida por el secreto
> profesional. Si usted no es la persona a quien va dirigido, por favor
> tome en cuenta que su divulgación, distribución o reproducción es
> estrictamente prohibida. Cualquier persona que reciba este mensaje por
> error debe notificarlo inmediatamente al remitente vía telefónica o
> correo electrónico y borrarlo permanentemente de su computador. Los
> comentarios plasmados en este correo son del remitente solamente y no
> reflejan necesariamente la posición de CTS S.A./
>
> */Por favor considere su responsabilidad con el medio ambiente antes
> de imprimir este correo electrónico/*
>
> /----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
>
> /This mail may contain information that is legally privileged,
> confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying
> of this message is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this
> message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or
> by e-mail and delete it permanently from their computer. The opinions
> above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> position of CTS S.A./
>
> */Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing
> this e-mail /*
>
> *From:* David Eldridge [mailto:DEldridge at grummanbutkus.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:51 AM
> *To:* Juan Carlos Sanabria F. <juan.sanabria at cts-cr.com>;
> equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Equest-users] Demand Direct Process Load
>
> Double check the timing of the peaks – the graphical presentation in
> eQUEST is the coincident peak – the contribution of each component at
> the time that the building hits its total highest demand.
>
> It’s likely that the proposed building has a peak later in the day due
> to one or more efficiency measures that are included. If the process
> loads are lower at this time, the graphical presentation will show
> that the peak component is less than the baseline case. (Or if the
> process ramps up later in the day, it could be more?)
>
> You’ll need to go into the *.SIM file to get the reported peaks for
> the process loads (and show the annual totals to also be the same) to
> demonstrate that the schedules are consistent, or otherwise explain to
> the reviewer what is happening.
>
> David
>
> __
>
> David S. Eldridge, Jr., P.E., LEED AP BD+C, BEMP, BEAP, HBDP
>
> *Grumman/Butkus Associates*
>
> __
>
> *From:* Equest-users
> [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Juan Carlos Sanabria F.
> *Sent:* Monday, September 21, 2015 6:10 PM
> *To:* equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
> <mailto:equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org>
> *Subject:* [Equest-users] Demand Direct Process Load
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m modeling a building for LEED, but when I go to equest LEED report
> I notice that my direct process load for demand is not equal, anyone
> know why this happen?
>
> I review the rate and the schedules and are the same also the energy
> load is the same for the proposed and the baseline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> * Ing. Juan Carlos Sanabria F. *
>
> Tel.: (506) 2256-7020
>
> Fax: (506) 2256-5608
>
> From USA: 1-305-433-3668
>
> Calle 30, Avenida 0 y 2. San José, Costa Rica
>
> Logo CTS firma//**
>
> /Este correo puede contener información protegida por el secreto
> profesional. Si usted no es la persona a quien va dirigido, por favor
> tome en cuenta que su divulgación, distribución o reproducción es
> estrictamente prohibida. Cualquier persona que reciba este mensaje por
> error debe notificarlo inmediatamente al remitente vía telefónica o
> correo electrónico y borrarlo permanentemente de su computador. Los
> comentarios plasmados en este correo son del remitente solamente y no
> reflejan necesariamente la posición de CTS S.A./
>
> */Por favor considere su responsabilidad con el medio ambiente antes
> de imprimir este correo electrónico/*
>
> /----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
>
> /This mail may contain information that is legally privileged,
> confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying
> of this message is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this
> message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or
> by e-mail and delete it permanently from their computer. The opinions
> above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> position of CTS S.A./
>
> */Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing
> this e-mail /*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0005.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 29472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0010.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 39439 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0011.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5920 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0008.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0009.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3142 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0010.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5449 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20151001/d086d985/attachment-0011.jpe>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list