[Equest-users] Values choosing of the typical equipment &miscellaneous power densities.

[Nick Caton]

Hi Joey,

 

I thought to write about the 25% topic but thought it best to not bring it up¡­  Perhaps a quick recap is in order for your situation and others¡¯ benefit!

 

There has been much discussion regarding that ¡°25% rule¡± between myself and others on these lists ([bldg-rate], [bldg-sim], [equest-users]).  Re: archives.

 

I started out with the same conclusion you¡¯re stating: the baseline consumption is supposed to be 25% plug/process loads.  The LEED 2.2 handbook is unfortunately worded under EAc1 to suggest this as a prescriptive default in the absence of substantial documentation, but that ¡°documentation¡± can be as simple as a one-line reference as I described.  Note the LEED v3 handbook (under EAp2 I think) re-words those lines on process loads to emphasize the expectation is to simply match between the models ¨C no mention of 25%.  

 

I have since that time done an about face on that viewpoint and believe that figure to be entirely arbitrary.  ¡°Forcing¡± 25% plug load consumption in the baseline is in many cases arbitrarily detrimental to the overall performance rating, is rarely realistic, and the resulting internal gains can cause irresolvable unmet hours for proposed equipment of a specified capacity (remembering the baseline and proposed should normally have matching process loads).  I came to the lists seeking to share and learn better approaches to ¡°fairly¡± mitigate these artificial internal loads, and in doing so learned I was far off the path from others.

 

I could re-iterate my perception of the history and intent behind the 25% figure, but you¡¯re probably best advised to seek out those discussions in the archives to come to a fuller understanding.  I would presently advise referencing and using something reasonable for your proposed building in both models, and not treating the 25% figure as a mandate, but do inform yourself by reading those archived discussions so that you can defend your position against any argumentative v2.2 reviewer.  

 

~Nick

 

 

 

NICK CATON, P.E.

SENIOR ENGINEER

 

Smith & Boucher Engineers

25501 west valley parkway, suite 200

olathe, ks 66061

direct 913.344.0036

fax 913.345.0617

www.smithboucher.com 

 

From: Jiao, Joey [mailto:Joey.Jiao at WSPGroup.com.cn] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:56 PM
To: Nick Caton
Subject: ´ð¸´: [Equest-users] Values choosing of the typical equipment &miscellaneous power densities.

 

Hi, Nick:

Thank you for your suggestion , it¡¯s really helpful!

I have found the TABLE GB, in ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Manual. See it below. I think it¡¯s what¡¯s your refer to.

As an addition,  I get another tip which should be a limitation for making a baseline model. 

On the LEED RATING SYSTEM , there is a rule that the process energy cost should be 25% of the total baseline energy cost. 

Hope it helpful for others.

Thanks for your help again.

 

Joey

 

·¢¼þÈË: Nick Caton [mailto:ncaton at smithboucher.com] 
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2011Äê9ÔÂ28ÈÕ 22:48
ÊÕ¼þÈË: Jiao, Joey; Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Ö÷Ìâ: RE: [Equest-users] Values choosing of the typical equipment &miscellaneous power densities.

 

Generally, the ¡°correct¡± baseline model values for these entries (misc/plug loads and occupancy/ventilation) are to match whatever is in the proposed model.

 

There is more than one ¡°correct¡± approach regarding misc load quantities for the proposed model.  In any case you should be prepared to reproduce what decision you made and back it up for baseline/proposed documentation:

-          Reference tables in the 90.1 users manual (also found in certain state energy codes) with representative W/SF figures for various ¡®whole building¡¯ types and assign that figure to each space.  I¡¯ve found this approach to be time-efficient and so far totally accepted by the USGBC/LEED reviewers.

-          Stick with the eQuest defaults per occupancy.  I¡¯m unsure of where they¡¯re all derived from exactly (Title 24?  Some other standard/reference?), but they will vary as you change space activity types and appear sensible from what I¡¯ve observed.  These values, default or otherwise, are rolled into a weighted average for each zone group based on the % distribution in the zone group screen ¨C which is why the resulting W/SF coming out of the wizards can appear somewhat random at first glance.

-          Flex your spreadsheet muscles and do a space-by-space plug load takeoff to come up with an ¡°actual¡± number.  I have never pursued this degree of detail myself, but I understand others have specifically to account for gains from providing efficient plug load equipment with the project over ¡°standard¡± equipment¡­ resulting in a deliberate divergence between the baseline/proposed models. 

 

I¡¯ve found eQuest default values for occupant density/ventilation/loads are pretty much on the mark as to what I¡¯d define from ASHRAE references, so I leave the defaults alone in wizards and only focus on tweaking the calculated zone occupant quantities in detailed mode as necessary for model QC and matching loads.  I do make a point to assign the appropriate ¡°space type percentages¡± for each zone in the following wizard screens however.

 

~Nick

 



 

NICK CATON, P.E.

SENIOR ENGINEER

 

Smith & Boucher Engineers

25501 west valley parkway, suite 200

olathe, ks 66061

direct 913.344.0036

fax 913.345.0617

www.smithboucher.com 

 

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org [mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Jiao, Joey
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:59 AM
To: Equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Values choosing of the typical equipment &miscellaneous power densities.

 

Hi, Everyone:

I¡¯m confused with the value choosing for the equipment & miscellaneous power densities like the illustrate below.

The table G 3.1 no.12 said it should be based on the building and space type, but there isn¡¯t other information. So do we need to add this load part  when we make a baseline model? 

Maybe this isn¡¯t very important , but I want to make sure about it.

I know we can choosing the lighting power densities in Section 9, but I can¡¯t find the table for other equipment. So what should you do?

 

 

By the way , about the occupancy density and ventilation inputs shown below, I found  the reference information from ASHRAE 62.1, is that a common way when we make a baseline? 

 

Thank you for your kindly help.

Best wishes.

 

Joey

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joey Jiao

Graduate Engineer         

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110929/3e3f92e9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110929/3e3f92e9/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 43365 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110929/3e3f92e9/attachment-0001.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 24838 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110929/3e3f92e9/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 29593 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110929/3e3f92e9/attachment-0001.png>