[Equest-users] LEED Paperwork - Defaults Overridden

[Patrick J. O'Leary, Jr.]

i've had comments on it both ways (entering zero, entering 200 for both, 
having different values for both).  the comment for me has been 
something along the lines of "default value over-rides is listed but no 
supporting documentation provided indicating how the numbers were 
arrived at."

i end up replying the number is approximate considering equest doesn't 
default to 90.1 (any year) values so the proposed design is reflective 
of the changes made to equest's default values & the baseline is close, 
but may have more, as it is modified from the proposed design to reflect 
90.1-(2004/2007) but neither is reflective of changes to default 90.1 
values.



On 1/18/11 7:30 AM, M. Shields wrote:
>
> Good Morning All,
>
> I know this has come up in the past and I have seen several responses 
> from going through and counting all of the schedules to just 
> estimating.  Regardless of how you have determined this value has 
> anyone then included a description of how this was done in their 
> narrative, or has anyone ever gotten any questions from their reviewer 
> about how the number was tabulated?  Also has anyone ever left it 
> blank as an unquantifiable number?  I think I could spend days trying 
> to count every default of my model and still be off by hundreds.
>
> Thanks for any feedback,
>
> ____________________________
> Michael Shields
>
> Phone: 803-493-4507
>
> Fax: 803-548-2511
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110118/9083fe44/attachment.htm>