[Equest-users] Unconditioned spaces and Space ZONE-TYPE vs. Zone TYPE

[Carol Gardner]

I have noticed that and not knowing what the impact of it is I always make
them the same.

Carol

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Bishop, Bill <wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com>wrote:

>  I just noticed that the space ZONE-TYPE can be different than the
> corresponding zone TYPE. For example, EL2 Core Spc (G.C7) has ZONE-TYPE
> “Conditioned” while EL2 Core Zn (G.C7) has TYPE-ZONE “Unconditioned”. The
> program/model doesn’t seem to have a problem with this and runs fine. Is
> this a deliberate capability intended by the DOE2.2/eQUEST programmers?
> Perhaps this is done to allow space loads (lighting, equipment etc.) to show
> up in the loads reports (LS-C, LS-D, LS-F) but not be transferred to
> systems? Hmm.
>
>
>
> ~Bill
>
>
>
> *William** Bishop, PE**, BEMP, LEED® AP **|** **Pathfinder Engineers &
> Architects LLP***
>
> Mechanical Engineer
>
>
>
> 134 South Fitzhugh Street
> Rochester, NY 14608
> T: (585) 325-6004 Ext. 114
> F: (585) 325-6005
>
> wbishop at pathfinder-ea.com
>
> www.pathfinder-ea.com
>
> P   Sustainability – the forest AND the trees. P
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>


-- 
Carol Gardner PE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20101013/629288fb/attachment.htm>